Undefeated in Regulation Streak

[Chickenhawk]

Everyone knows that UConn WBB had a 111 game winning streak. How long was UConn’s longest undefeated in regulation streak? I believe it is 208 games; from March 12, 2013 to January 3, 2019 with 3 OT losses in between. Is that correct? Seems like that will be tough to beat.

 

[UcMiami]

My math:
2013 - 6 ncaa wins - loss to ND in BE 3/12/13 in regulation
2014 - 40 wins - no losses
2015 - 38 wins - loss to Stanford on 11/17/14 was in OT
2016 - 38 wins - no losses
2017 - 36 wins - loss in FF to MsSt on 3/31/17 was in OT
2018 - 36 wins - loss in FF to ND on 3/30/18 was in OT
2019 - 11 wins - loss to Baylor on 1/3/19 in regulation

Total = 205 wins.

Were you counting the three OT losses? I guess as an 'undefeated in regulation streak that works, as a 'wins without loss in regulation' streak 205 is the number

 

[Chickenhawk]

You counted like I counted except I was counted the OT games in which we lost because UConn was not defeated in regulation, only in the overtime period and I had defined the Streak as Undefeated in Regulation. Either way, that's a lot of games and must be the record for Undefeated in Regulation except maybe Wayland Baptist way back when

 

[eebmg]

Cant wait for the 1st Q. streak calculation.

 

[JordyG]

Cant wait for the 1st Q. streak calculation.

Since I can't wait I'm just going to do it the old fashioned way.

 

[Skeets]

Let's not forget the 1,023 consecutive games without back-to-back losses. I believe this counts all the games, tournaments, etc. Needless to say, this streak is on the line first game of the season every year UCONN does win the NC.

 

[DefenseBB]

Let's not forget the 1,023 consecutive games without back-to-back losses. I believe this counts all the games, tournaments, etc. Needless to say, this streak is on the line first game of the season every year UCONN does NOT win the NC.

There, I fixed it for you. I think you left out the word "not"

 

[Skeets]

There, I fixed it for you. I think you left out the word "not"

Thanks. Could have been "n't" on the end of does, but you guys knew what I meant