Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JS, post: 2370371, member: 6"] Charlie, you've been so voluble in defense of this ruling that I'm curious. Putting aside the rather stupefying standard applied -- phony course must be exclusively/primarily/whatever available to athletes -- and all the other stuff on the "legality" front, do you agree with the following from the SI article you cited? [INDENT]UNC absolutely should be ashamed of what happened. North Carolina was not a victim of some media smear campaign. Widespread academic fraud occurred at the university for many years. This goes against the very purpose of any school’s existence. It is more offensive than most transgressions that bring heavy NCAA sanctions. [/INDENT] 'Cause while looking at the sum total of your output in the thread -- including some of the everybody does it flavor and the seeming equation of steering toward "easy" courses with fraudulent ones -- I don't get much sense of any personal disgust at what happened. [/QUOTE]