UNC losing to a bad Clemson team. | The Boneyard

UNC losing to a bad Clemson team.

Status
Not open for further replies.

speedoo

Big Apple Big Dog
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
2,994
Reaction Score
1,314
Yeah, the heels will pull it out, but UNC is about as bad as they have ever been..

Enjoy yourself, Diamond.
 
With those frosh, they will be a lot better next year. But I was never sold on their ranking this year -- they were terrible in 2011-12, and didn't add much so I think they are severely overrated. But with the way their conference schedule works out, they could be 16-2 by mid-January. That 2nd loss being the smackdown that MD will give them this Thursday.
 
Ruffin-Pratt may be healthy for the first time in her college career--she was ranked almost even with Skylar in high school--and Xylina is a player. But they are far from an elite team. They are a misleading 12-1. I think they make the NCAAs this year and win 1 tourney game, maybe 2, if at home.
 
They are the OSU of 2012-2013. Altho in fairness, they did beat OSU this year lol. But i could see them ending the year with only 5-6 losses (2 to MD, 2 to Duke, and probably 1 to FSU), which still probably puts them in the top 15 and gets them a 4 seed. Let's hope they are in UCONN's bracket lol.

Then again, maybe they lose games to teams like Ga Tech, Miami, and a few others as well. I agree they are not a good team.

As for next year, they will certainly have talent, but without fundamentals and execution, a cupcake schedule won't expose them till they play teams like Duke and Maryland.

BTW, 26 turnovers by UNC against Clemson? AND they are being out-rebounded by 10? Holy cow. I'm i'm a halfway decent team in the ACC, I'm salivating at those statistics.
 
Ruffin-Pratt may be healthy for the first time in her college career--she was ranked almost even with Skylar in high school--and Xylina is a player. But they are far from an elite team. They are a misleading 12-1. I think they make the NCAAs this year and win 1 tourney game, maybe 2, if at home.
Diamond and the other frosh will help, but as long as Hatchell is the coach, UNC will underachieve.
 
Diamond and the other frosh will help, but as long as Hatchell is the coach, UNC will underachieve.
That's almost a truism. I totally agree.

Next year, they will be athletic, flashy, and improved, but fundamentally weak.
 
UNC retook the lead, and were up by nine, but Clemson cut it to 3.

In other news Texas is losing to an under 500 team.
 
UNC retook the lead, and were up by nine, but Clemson cut it to 3.

In other news Texas is losing to an under 500 team.
The theme of this post is underachievement by former elite teams.
 
Sad Tiger.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
797
Total visitors
880

Forum statistics

Threads
164,038
Messages
4,379,865
Members
10,173
Latest member
mangers


.
..
Top Bottom