Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="UConnNick, post: 2301462, member: 1526"]
Agreed. If the Jefferson Co. CC loses its 2013 natty for hookers, UNC should lose two for something that's apparently been going on systematically for almost 20 years. Their defense is based on their assertion that these gut courses were available to the entire student body. If they convince anybody at the NCAA of that, then the whole organization is more corrupt than anybody already thinks it is. They purposely didn't list these courses in any universal sense for all UNC students to enroll in, because if they had they'd have maxed out on registration day in about five minutes. Who wouldn't want to sign up for a course with a guaranteed high grade just for turning in a term paper? Filling the class up with non-athletes would have not kept enough space open for the athletes. The idea that nobody in the athletic dept. knew what was going on is preposterous.

What about the professors involved that "taught" these classes? What do they have to say about awarding automatic high grades for very little student effort?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach