Unbelievable dook stat | The Boneyard

Unbelievable dook stat

To be fair, when you're a 1 seed most of the time, you don't get many opportunities. That said, they have failed to beat a better seed in:
  • 2003 (#3 seed, lost to #2 Kansas)
  • 2013 (#2 seed, lost to #1 Louisville)
  • 2016 (#4 seed, lost to #1 Oregon)
  • 2018 (#2 seed, lost to #1 Kansas)
  • 2023 (#5 seed, lost to #4 Tennessee)
 
Also, for all the talk about the brackets disintegrating to our benefit, over that time we have actually beaten higher seeds in:
  • 2023 (#4 over #3 Gonzaga)
  • 2016 (#9 over #8 Colorado)
  • 2014 (#7 over #2 Villanova, #3 Iowa State, #4 Michigan State, and #1 Florida)
  • 2011 (#3 over #2 SDSU)
  • 2004 (#2 over #1 Duke)
  • 2003 (#5 over #4 Stanford)

Our problem in the mid-00s was losing to lower seeds and in the 90s and early 00s was not being able to get over the hump against #1 seeds.
 
Seems very similar to our decade-long streak of 21 straight road losses against ranked opponents. One of those stats that one cannot believe is real.
 
Thought this would be that they’ve led the nation in trips (called and uncalled) for 10 years straight but that wouldn’t really fall under ‘unbelievable’…

F Duke
 
All this means is that Puke has been overrated annually.
But most of us knew that already!!!
 
How did they beat JMU by so much? I missed that game. JMU had looked so good previously.
 
How did they beat JMU by so much? I missed that game. JMU had looked so good previously.
Their guy McCain shot out of his mind, 8-11 from 3. The rest of the team was also a respectable 6-17.

And this was in the same arena with the same balls where we then shot 3-23.
 
Their guy McCain shot out of his mind, 8-11 from 3. The rest of the team was also a respectable 6-17.

And this was in the same arena with the same balls where we then shot 3-23.
that was not lost on me either. I rationalized that Jared McCain and the rest of the Duke team used up the allotted 3 pointers made for the day in Brooklyn.
 
Also, for all the talk about the brackets disintegrating to our benefit, over that time we have actually beaten higher seeds in:
  • 2023 (#4 over #3 Gonzaga)
  • 2016 (#9 over #8 Colorado)
  • 2014 (#7 over #2 Villanova, #3 Iowa State, #4 Michigan State, and #1 Florida)
  • 2011 (#3 over #2 SDSU)
  • 2004 (#2 over #1 Duke)
  • 2003 (#5 over #4 Stanford)

Our problem in the mid-00s was losing to lower seeds and in the 90s and early 00s was not being able to get over the hump against #1 seeds.
Expanding on this, we were actually ridiculously unlucky for most of the 90s and 00s how often brackets didn't fall apart in our favor, and we ended up facing the chalkiest possible seeds in 1994 (#3 Florida in S16), 1995 (#1 UCLA), 1998 (#1 UNC), 2002 (#1 Maryland), and 2003 (#1 Texas).

Not once did we benefit from a 1 seed losing prematurely, when it should have happened at least once or twice. In fact, it wasn't until 2004 that we benefited from a 1 seed being upset before we were set to face them.
 
Expanding on this, we were actually ridiculously unlucky for most of the 90s and 00s how often brackets didn't fall apart in our favor, and we ended up facing the chalkiest possible seeds in 1994 (#3 Florida in S16), 1995 (#1 UCLA), 1998 (#1 UNC), 2002 (#1 Maryland), and 2003 (#1 Texas).

Not once did we benefit from a 1 seed losing prematurely, when it should have happened at least once or twice. In fact, it wasn't until 2004 that we benefited from a 1 seed being upset before we were set to face them.
We would've if Donyell made one of those free throws.
 

Online statistics

Members online
273
Guests online
2,226
Total visitors
2,499

Forum statistics

Threads
164,227
Messages
4,388,067
Members
10,196
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom