Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="housekeys, post: 5132667, member: 2379"] The UMES game did not say a whole lot about how good UConn is. The game that did say how good/bad UConn is, was the Memphis game. Now, Auburn is the best. [URL='https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore/_/gameId/401729696']Auburn[/URL] and [URL='https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore/_/gameId/401715611']UConn[/URL] have one common opponent, Memphis. That is the game that says a lot about UConn and their potential. I invite everyone to do a box score comparison and come up with your own conclusion. Here is mine. UConn did not play particularly well and had it not been for the late surge, deserved to lose the Memphis game. But only because of the FTA disparity. If Memphis had the same disparity against Auburn, they may have won that game. So if the disparity was "earned" due to poor UConn defense and lack of discipline, then UConn must correct this to attain their full potential. It is also possible that the disparity was not earned by their performance on the floor, but due to poor officials( likely ) and other speculative reasons( less likely ). Either way, if I was Dan Hurley, I would not dwell on the speculative and instead, stick to his original script, get better and deal with the things he can control. [/QUOTE]