Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
UConn Transfer rate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Moose, post: 3137998, member: 1785"] My opinion is that having players transfer out shouldn't be seen as such of a failing, but more of the pursuit of a mutually agreed upon path for a better experience. I think a lot of posters seem to think that it is obvious where a player is going to fall on the depth chart before they join a team, but I don't think that's easy to know at all. Courtney Ekmark was getting all the press for that incoming recruiting class - should Kia and Sadie have concluded that they would fall lower on the depth chart and chosen other schools? I think all of those players Kia, Gabby, Sadie and Courtney believed in themselves that they'd be the ones to rise up and be starters. And of course they should back themselves, if you don't try, how will you know? Part of it is that coaches are realizing that their best chance to win is to only play their best 5 players. The best 5 should be well conditioned enough to play the entire game. That means that the players rated 6-8 on the depth chart might not even be much worse than the player at 5, but from 5 to 6 on the depth chart sees a big drop off in playing time: from 40 mins/game to 0! Therefore, I could see that Geno might say to player like Ekmark, you're great, but I don't think you'll crack the starting 5 here, you only get to play college ball once, I don't want to take that chance away from you. The players give it 2 years because they believe in themselves and want to take a shot, but UCONN starters are probably the 1% - so you fall in the 1.1%, you can still achieve success on your terms at a P5 school. With all these transfers, I see two parties doing what is best for them. It's not clear these players leave on bad terms, and I prefer to think that they don't. There was incomplete information on how things would pan out initially, now we have a better idea, make a new decision. I think the coaches are indirectly driving this transfer shift as a consequence of the 'play only your best 5' strategy (which in my opinion IS the winning strategy). [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
UConn Transfer rate
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom