Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 5218285, member: 7492"]
The problem as I see it is the fact there is a “seeding protocol” that the committee uses and far too many posters either refuse to read it, understand how it works in total (it is not just NET) or just want to ignore it altogether to allow their misguided narrative to argue their fandom.

There are 6 really good teams and my own order of best to less is 
1. SC
2.UConn
3. UCLA
4. USC
5. Texas 
6.ND

LSU, NC Stete and Duke round out my top 9.

SC has responded very well since the loss to us and have significant deeper front court depth and a coach who can perform well in March. 
UConn for all its improvement and streak since Tennessee still needs to shoot the 3 well to take the pressure off Jana and Ice.
I think there is a drop off to 3/4 as I find both those coaches X’s and O’s challenged despite the unbelievable depth of talent on both rosters.
Texas is just lacking offense and struggles to outscore good offensive teams.
ND has slipped mightily but if they can refund their mojo, they are dangerous.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach