Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3760140, member: 3535"] At this point tell me what we are arguing. Because when I said :"undefeated seasons" and I'm talking of A/A awards - it could only mean reg. season and not the NCAA Tourney championship. They have separate awards for the tourney I believe. So when you mention championship-- I was not referring to that. So-- what are we arguing? Further, what I have been arguing all along is that soxfan23 said AMak will be "NOWHERE NEAR" an A/A. I imply/claim an Honorable Mention A/a is "near" an A/a. DO you agree with my definition? So your comment to me about 3 A/a's is not what I was arguing. I am not arguing that AMak will be an A/a. I am arguing that the point that soxfan23 said by stating she is NOWHERE NEAR an A/a when imo if CWill and Evina perform to competent levels but not higher than that then absolutely AMak can be an Honorable Mention A/A- thus be "Near" A/A status. It seems you are sticking up for his NOWHERE NEAR comment but I can't 100% tell. I do agree with you that some here have too much exuberance - averaging 25 ppg? No way no how no way no how no way she scores that. No way no how no way no how. Though back to the [B]possibility[/B] of AMak being near A/a or A/A - IMO it is NOT unreasonable to assume that CWill MIGHT NOT perform at Honorable Mention A/A level nor is it unreasonable to assume that Evina's knee might limit her ability to become an Honorable Mention A/A. This means more shots - especially from 3 for the tall wing in AMak that is also a very good passer. For example- on fastbreaks you are going to look for the tall wing that is your best 3pt shooter that knocks them down at possibly 42% this year. Unless the opposing team is just going to give yo layups- but they don't do that then by her taking these 3's it's equivalent in terms of fg% to 63%. That's excellent. - [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,483

Messages: 4,398,060

Members: 10,212

Latest member: MurrDog