- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,262
- Reaction Score
- 1,222
I don't think so.
Mizzou's first two games were against Southeast Missouri State and Arkansas State. UConn's first two games were against Villanova and Army.
Villanova and Army are by far better teams than Southeast Missouri State. In addition to that Nova has the best player in FCS, so with that being said it does not bother me one bit Villanova and Army were competitive against us. We still won both games. Arkansas State is probably as good as both Nova and Army and Mizzou just squeezed by to take the W.
Now, the head to head team stats are almost identical. Take a look:
http://connecticut.247sports.com/StatGame/Missouri-Tigers-Connecticut-Huskies-15025#MIZZ
UConn has better overall Individual stats than Mizzou as well. Now, I'm not saying we're going to destroy Mizzou, but I will say this game is going to be a lot closer than Mizzou fans think. The only advantage Mizzou will have is homefield advantage. #GoHuskies
Mizzou's first two games were against Southeast Missouri State and Arkansas State. UConn's first two games were against Villanova and Army.
Villanova and Army are by far better teams than Southeast Missouri State. In addition to that Nova has the best player in FCS, so with that being said it does not bother me one bit Villanova and Army were competitive against us. We still won both games. Arkansas State is probably as good as both Nova and Army and Mizzou just squeezed by to take the W.
Now, the head to head team stats are almost identical. Take a look:
http://connecticut.247sports.com/StatGame/Missouri-Tigers-Connecticut-Huskies-15025#MIZZ
UConn has better overall Individual stats than Mizzou as well. Now, I'm not saying we're going to destroy Mizzou, but I will say this game is going to be a lot closer than Mizzou fans think. The only advantage Mizzou will have is homefield advantage. #GoHuskies