- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction Score
- 21,542
I was surprised when I went back and compared UConn's recruiting rankings with their AAC peers for the last 4 recruiting classes plus this year's. Here are the top 5 ranked teams by year:
2012: 1) Houston, 2) UConn, 3) Memphis, 4) Temple, 5) USF
2013: 1) Memphis, 2) SMU, 3) Cincinnati, 4) USF, 5) UConn
2014: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) Memphis, 4) UCF, 5) USF
2015: 1) Memphis, 2) SMU, 3) UConn, 4) USF, 5) Temple
2016: 1) UConn, 2) SMU, 3) Cincinnati, 4) Memphis, 5) USF
From the 2012 and 2013 recruiting classes, UConn has one starter: Brimah. Also, the 2014 #1 ranked recruiting class has produced only 1 significant contributor, Hamilton, as Lubin has transferred and Cassell is on the bench.
Sure UConn has had grad students and transfers, but so have the other AAC teams. Bottom line is that UConn has not brought in significantly better players to dominate the AAC.
UConn recruiting used to be more dominant relative to the AAC. Look at the rankings from pre-2012:
2011: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) UCF, 4) Memphis, 5) SMU
2010: 1) Memphis, 2) UConn, 3) Tulsa, 4) Cincinnati, 5) Temple
2009: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) UCF, 4) USF, 5) Memphis
2008: 1) Memphis, 2) UConn, 3) Cincinnati, 4) ECU, 5) SMU
2007: 1) Cincinnati, 2) Memphis, 3) Temple, 4) SMU, 5) Houston (10 UConn 1 player Beverly)
2006: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) USF, 4) Cincinnati, 5) UCF
2005: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) Cincinnati, 4) SMU, 5) Houston
2004: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) Cincinnati, 4) Tulsa, 5) UCF
2003: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) USF, 4) Cincinnati, 5) Temple
The pre-2012 rankings show UConn first 6 times and second twice with one year a 10 ranking with a one player recruiting class.
The 2016 recruiting class should be a big piece of putting UConn back on top with 4 players coming in.
2012: 1) Houston, 2) UConn, 3) Memphis, 4) Temple, 5) USF
2013: 1) Memphis, 2) SMU, 3) Cincinnati, 4) USF, 5) UConn
2014: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) Memphis, 4) UCF, 5) USF
2015: 1) Memphis, 2) SMU, 3) UConn, 4) USF, 5) Temple
2016: 1) UConn, 2) SMU, 3) Cincinnati, 4) Memphis, 5) USF
From the 2012 and 2013 recruiting classes, UConn has one starter: Brimah. Also, the 2014 #1 ranked recruiting class has produced only 1 significant contributor, Hamilton, as Lubin has transferred and Cassell is on the bench.
Sure UConn has had grad students and transfers, but so have the other AAC teams. Bottom line is that UConn has not brought in significantly better players to dominate the AAC.
UConn recruiting used to be more dominant relative to the AAC. Look at the rankings from pre-2012:
2011: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) UCF, 4) Memphis, 5) SMU
2010: 1) Memphis, 2) UConn, 3) Tulsa, 4) Cincinnati, 5) Temple
2009: 1) UConn, 2) Cincinnati, 3) UCF, 4) USF, 5) Memphis
2008: 1) Memphis, 2) UConn, 3) Cincinnati, 4) ECU, 5) SMU
2007: 1) Cincinnati, 2) Memphis, 3) Temple, 4) SMU, 5) Houston (10 UConn 1 player Beverly)
2006: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) USF, 4) Cincinnati, 5) UCF
2005: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) Cincinnati, 4) SMU, 5) Houston
2004: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) Cincinnati, 4) Tulsa, 5) UCF
2003: 1) UConn, 2) Memphis, 3) USF, 4) Cincinnati, 5) Temple
The pre-2012 rankings show UConn first 6 times and second twice with one year a 10 ranking with a one player recruiting class.
The 2016 recruiting class should be a big piece of putting UConn back on top with 4 players coming in.