- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction Score
- 328
UConn ranked #80 and #8 in aac from SB nation. Here's the link http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...-rankings-ratings-2015-college-football-teams
How is this a possible with all the CT Kids they have 'poached' to go to BC instead of UConn?If it makes anyone feel better, BC is the lowest ranked P5 school coming in at #68.
How is this a possible with all the CT Kids they have 'poached' to go to BC instead of UConn?
Someone remind me why it is important to keep the instate kids 'home'?? I must be still confused on this - is it because their friends and family will fill the Rent??
How is this a possible with all the CT Kids they have 'poached' to go to BC instead of UConn?
Someone remind me why it is important to keep the instate kids 'home'?? I must be still confused on this - is it because their friends and family will fill the Rent??
Bonehead if you can't recruit kids from Connecticut... where the hell can you recruit from?
If the program isn't compelling enough for people that live here to play here what does that say about the long term viability?
Is this another situation where college football needs to be reinvented? Only every other school in the country tries to keep local kids.
You don't want Connecticut kids for the sake of being from Connecticut - but the kids that can play why is the hell wouldn't you want them? If Syracuse or Penn State or BC wants them - why wouldn't we?
Those three schools plus Duke took 10 players from CT this year - now some are prep school kids and might not be from Connecticut but I'd take every single one of them given the opportunity.
I don't get this. In one breath you're upset BC flipped Zach Allen and Diaco couldnt, in the other you could care less if we land any CT kids?How is this a possible with all the CT Kids they have 'poached' to go to BC instead of UConn?
Someone remind me why it is important to keep the instate kids 'home'?? I must be still confused on this - is it because their friends and family will fill the Rent??
Not in same breath -I don't get this. In one breath you're upset BC flipped Zach Allen and Diaco couldnt, in the other you could care less if we land any CT kids?
No bone of contention here bone but I have watched this argument go on for years. Personally I feel any recruit we lose to BC we get lateral quality from somewhere else. We have had some pretty good kids from Mass here over the years.How is this a possible with all the CT Kids they have 'poached' to go to BC instead of UConn?
Someone remind me why it is important to keep the instate kids 'home'?? I must be still confused on this - is it because their friends and family will fill the Rent??