Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4322130, member: 3535"] Again you are trying to change the subject of the thread. Can you identify where the OP suggested about MVP's????? The thread creation was about "making the WNBA." Then on a prior post you tried to go off the thread subject by speaking of players that are only in the WNBA for "UCONN name only" and pretending like they don’t deserve to be on only because of their name. -- As if you know. To reiterate the OP made reference to "making the WNBA." 1--- The point wasn't MVP's which you seem to want to bring up for some odd reason. This was not the point of the thread. But you feel like you need to get your dig in? 2--- The point wasn't bottom of the bench players that didn't deserve it - which you seem to want to bring up for some odd reason - as if you know who deserves and who doesn't. OFC you say this without bias, right? Just want to get another dig in? 3--- Though, not you, another poster trying to being up starters and minutes which wasn't anything to do with the OP point as well. Can’t let some fans make some positive posts about UCONN without a dig by changing the subject of the thread, can we? [B]Oddly, in a way you are agreeing though with the OP though with your point 2 comment that UCONN has some players in the WNBA "by reputation only." Well then - if that were the reason then wouldn't it mean what the OP is saying is accurate? Regardless of “MVP” or “starter” or “minutes” that the UCONN name is getting players in the WNBA rate at a higher level than everyone else?[/B] But hey, you are on a UCONN site as a non-UCONN fan but a PAC-10 fan; you can’t let the Husky positive slide, right? [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach