- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,799
- Reaction Score
- 15,832
If UConn wants to be competing with UMass and UVM on the recruiting trail, you're right they can stay in XL and compete. If they want to recruit against the elite of the league, XL will not suffice. They will not be able to recruit against BC and BU in HE, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Denver, even into the next tier of QU, PC, Lowell, and other upstarts with great facilities on campus where you can practice, workout, and play in one place. I've said this a hundred times here and I'll keep saying it, hockey players want to play where they practice. Knowing the ins and outs of your home rink is an enormous advantage. There is a reason why virtually no hockey schools play in arenas significantly off campus.So to distill this discussion it comes down to a debate whether or not a new on campus building which will host maybe 6 games a year is necessary to keep pace or move up on the recruiting food chain.
So is UMass Amherst a comparable? They play ALL their home games on campus. They have had several highly regarded coaches of varying pholosophies. Has the Mullins Center enabled UMass to get to the next level? For a very brief period over a time scale of 20 years I suppose. But then we get into a discussion of "because of or in spite of".
Somehow to me the argument of recruiting necessity really doesn't hold water. But that is only my gut feel. Reasonable folks can differ on the question.
I'm not sure what "real schedule" you're talking about. The list of HE teams coming into XL isn't changing save for ND. Better OOC games? Perhaps, but the high-end B1G and NCHC teams aren't showing up to Hartford anytime soon and the rest of the mid-level college hockey teams don't carry the name cache to attract casual sports fans to a UConn hockey game.I don't want to give up the 5,500 avg. we have which will only rise with a real schedule
This is a ridiculous statement on so many levels. You're now forcing students interested in supporting their own school to carpool 30-45 minutes each way so that a few thousand Hartford residents, who own cars, don't have to drive to Storrs? Selflish, absurd, short-sighted, and arcane are words that come to mind here.Your point about parking is an indictment on the apathetic UConn student in regards to their hockey team, if some of them actually cared to support them they'd be able to carpool together and it would be a non-issue.
How do you know they don't care about the niche sport of hockey? Because they all didn't carpool to a game? The kids who have small bank accounts, limited access to cars, class, schoolwork, etc. don't support the niche sport because they didn't spend 60-90 minutes in total driving into Hartford, paying for parking, and paying for city-priced food? This is a great way to gauge support. However, we have seen the students willing to support "niche sports" on campus, as the soccer program and the Goal Patrol can attest.The students do not care about the niche sport of hockey but HFD County has demonstrated they absolutely do.
There's a place in the program for playing at Hartford selectively. But if they want to compete at the highest level of the sport consistently, that will not happen at XL. Don't take my word for it, take Cav's.
"Now in his third season at UConn, Cavanaugh said he stresses to recruits that people, not buildings, are the foundation for a strong program.
"I do say that," Cavanaugh said. "If I get upset about the facility every day, it's like getting upset about a hooking call."
"I can only control what I can control and right now this is the environment and this is the facility I have to practice in," Cavanaugh said. "So I can choose to make this an excuse in the recruiting process or I can say we're doing the best with what we have. If you don't have the best, do the best with that you have, right? So that's what we're doing right now. Would I like a new practice facility here, or par with what our football and basketball programs have? Absolutely. Do I think that would help benefit our recruiting? Absolutely."