- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,831
- Reaction Score
- 351,536
There is probably a decent correlation with the downward spiral in the state's crappy economy then couple that with the downward spiral in the football product and get the trend we see.Wow. Based on Medic's numbers, we've gone from 11,000 non-season ticket holder purchases per game to 4,000 non-season ticket holders per game in just 1 year.
The diehards are still about the same in number. The broke diehards and casuals rapidly went down, even with some of the excitement of seeing Edsall back with folks like Lashlee joining us. This is more depressing than going 3-9. To echo the sentiment that I and others have stated for multiple years here; they have to get the price down to drive the product up. Even if it costs you money in the short term...
Which part is bogus? There were a lot more empties this year it seemed. I couldn't believe the Missouri game had so many empty seats.Those numbers are completely bogus.
The slide has been slow and steady.
Which part is bogus? There were a lot more empties this year it seemed. I couldn't believe the Missouri game had so many empty seats.
The UConn people have botched this at every turn.
Crazy that more people came out to watch the diasaster that was 2016 than last year's games.
Pretty much every year before this one.
Something that they have never done. Tickets have been overpriced from the get-go.If they want more fans the best thing they could do (besides win) is to price the stadium like they want more fans.
Something that they have never done. Tickets have been overpriced from the get-go.
And big crowds for UVA and Cuse with a lot of visitor fansCame off of a bowl season with some real hope, that’s the only difference