Not trying to be a dink, but this stuff is all just hot air IMO. As much as we'd like to think that Diaco's out there trying to field scholars, he doesn't care. He just wants guys who are going to get us an APR that we won't be ashamed of (which should be anyone so long as you know how to guide them through school) and avoid any embarrassments or scandals. Diaco said it himself in his first year regarding Jefferson Ashiru--he said he didn't want guys who cared about math more than they cared about football.
First, the APR is a joke. Memphis has a strong APR and they're effectively teaching kids how to color between the lines.
I disagree on diaco not caring -- he's been clear he wants football players who are passionate about all aspects of life, including schools. Besides, do you really believe Ashiru got benched for wanting to do math homework?
Diaco said it himself in his first year regarding Jefferson Ashiru--he said he didn't want guys who cared about math more than they cared about football.
I'm guessing you are using the term taught figuratively, not literally.Wow. Auburn must have hired that guy who taught at North Carolina!
I'm near certain that quote was not made about or in reference to JA. It was made in reference to the types of players UConn was targeting during the recruiting process and the team that HCBD wanted to put together.
You're right. It was in this Jacobs column on Ashiru leaving the team and I must have just associated the two as one situation. Still, regardless of whether Diaco was speaking specifically about Ashiru or in generalities, that quote flies in the face of the narrative that we're too concerned about the student component of being a student athlete.
Here is the full quote from Diaco:
"We are interested in collecting players that fit UConn. That want to go to school at UConn, that are excited to go to school at UConn. They are achievement-oriented, you're interested in going to class. You're interested in doing the things you are a part of. We are interested in collecting players that love football. If you don't love football enough, because you love something else, we're not going to get along. You don't want a player that loves math four times more than football. You need to collect players that love football. After that, they've shown this level of achievement, they want to come to UConn, they're excited to come to UConn, and they love football. After that, we have tangible traits that we believe, if we can put a big, athletic team on the field, we're going to have a chance to win more than lose. We're going to have a chance to have a good team. We can have a good team if we have those first intangible traits, and are big and athletic tangibly. So we're recruiting to that model, we've been recruiting to that model since we started."
There clearly needs to be a balance between the two (athletics and academics) and whether the current means of measuring APR is a joke or not - it's a measure that until changed, must be met or face the repercussions of not meeting it (as we well know).
All Husky teams that exceed the metric should be commended and the university should be commended for providing the necessary support to do it - no?
Not trying to be a dink, but this stuff is all just hot air IMO. As much as we'd like to think that Diaco's out there trying to field scholars, he doesn't care. He just wants guys who are going to get us an APR that we won't be ashamed of (which should be anyone so long as you know how to guide them through school) and avoid any embarrassments or scandals.
So our APR score was actually 990 and not the 969 as the headline states? If accurate, can a moderator please change that? Doesn't make sense to be advertising a false number.UConnFootball4:32pm via TweetDeck
Husky football had a 990 NCAA APR score in 2014-15 -- the highest ever in program history! #GetReady
Jim Fuller: The New Haven Register Blogs: Ramblings from The Runway: UConn football program records highest APR score
So our APR score was actually 990 and not the 969 as the headline states? If accurate, can a moderator please change that? Doesn't make sense to be advertising a false number.
The 969 is the 4-year average. 990 is the past season. Either way, good stuff.So our APR score was actually 990 and not the 969 as the headline states? If accurate, can a moderator please change that? Doesn't make sense to be advertising a false number.
No, not at all. Thought it might have been posted incorrectly, but your explanation about the 4 vs 1 year clears that up! Thanks M!In case you weren't being sarcastic - the 969 was the 4 year average used by NCAA for eligibility purposes --- 990 was 2014-2015 period.
Thanks HP.... Wasn't clear on it. Both are indeed good numbers...thanks!The 969 is the 4-year average. 990 is the past season. Either way, good stuff.
Not bad for the Huskies. Good to see us avoiding trouble in the academic area. As long as HCBD is here I don't see this being an issue for us
Because Cal can put his players into nonsense classes where they can scrape by on a C average while taking the requisite number of classes to be considered on track, and get his team a 1000 score.If Kentucky basketball can get 1000 year after year, why does anyone follow the rules?