Change Ad Consent UConn: Cancelling 2020 Season An Option? | Page 7 | The Boneyard

UConn: Cancelling 2020 Season An Option?

-

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
36,153
Likes
31,009
College Football's scheduling approach is a runaway freight train to disaster. The P5 schools keeping their existing schedules because of the TV money is so staggeringly reckless and irresponsible that they are legally negligent on their face. It would take one COVID death for an athletic department to be sued into oblivion.

The smart play for UConn may be to take this season off and then see what is left of college football next year.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
8,004
Likes
12,131
Word is there will be news on the season this week, perhaps Wednesday.

Either we book replacement games or we recognize the reality everyone else is reluctant to accept.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,149
Likes
8,832
It is becoming apparent that not playing at all is quite likely. I will double down on my assertion that we shouldn’t be first to bail on the season. Let someone else do it first.

I am backing off on the idea that we should play just a few games if that’s all we can come up with. I’d rather keep more players eligible for next year. A short schedule that takes a full season of eligibility away from our guys probably isn’t worth it.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
374
Likes
466
Right because sitting out during a pandemic when your schedule has been torn to shreds signals that we don’t care about football.
If everyone else can figure out how to make it work and we can’t that is what it means. Going independent was already evidence of that.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
2,872
Likes
5,259
There may not be a team out there that benefits more from no season than UConn. Randy is continuing to re-make the roster bringing in more speed and kids with upside. There may be some fourth and fifth year seniors who were gearing up for their final season who decide after graduating that it's time to get on with their lives which would lessen the scholly log jam while allowing everyone who hadn't redshirted to get that year.....plus we get more Randy-type players into the mix with fewer Diaco-types. Mix in the way Randy is positioning this (I'm the equivalent of the players union rep) and their attitude to play anyone, anywhere, anytime plus the general positivity around the AD (Hurley, Big East and football TV contract) and the winds of positivity are starting to blow again for this program even during this pandemic.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
36,153
Likes
31,009
College Football's scheduling approach is a runaway freight train to disaster. The P5 schools keeping their existing schedules because of the TV money is so staggeringly reckless and irresponsible that they are legally negligent on their face. It would take one COVID death for an athletic department to be sued into oblivion.

The smart play for UConn may be to take this season off and then see what is left of college football next year.
Every school, even an IVY, cancelling a sport increases the legal exposure for every school that goes forward with athletics. The number of schools that suspended athletics is going to figure prominently in the opening argument of every lawsuit filed by the family of anyone that gets critically ill or dies of COVID as a result of playing. And the AD's and Presidents of schools that chose not to play will be popular witnesses in those trials.

Instead of making threats and giving ultimatums to the NCAA and small conferences, the smart move for the P5 would be to convince them to go along, or play nice in some way, shape or form.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,061
Likes
5,426
If we cancelled it would be putting $$$ ahead of athletes. Any athlete worth his salt wants to play.
Ah yes the No True Scotsman argument.

any REAL athlete would want to play. If you're afraid and 19 years old, you're not a REAL athlete. Never mind that many professional athlete have decided not to play despite giving up MILLIONS of dollars, but if you're a kid and you are afraid, you aren't a REAL athlete, you heard it here, from the safety of the BlueDogs Keyboard.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
374
Likes
466
Ah yes the No True Scotsman argument.

any REAL athlete would want to play. If you're afraid and 19 years old, you're not a REAL athlete. Never mind that many professional athlete have decided not to play despite giving up MILLIONS of dollars, but if you're a kid and you are afraid, you aren't a REAL athlete, you heard it here, from the safety of the BlueDogs Keyboard.

That’s the great thing about freedom. The players that want to play - in MLB about 98 percent - can play and the ones that don’t can stay home.
 

Top