Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="caw, post: 4519211, member: 563"] Too many factors besides a single game. It's formula is pretty in-depth overall. Better than RPI. Plus it's not like you are talking about things in a bubble with a static group of comparison teams. Did the teams around those teams win/lose. Did they play poorly at home, did the teams they had "good" wins/losses against become worse. Etc. Unlike voters who won't move a team down without a loss, the computer will jump teams all the time if the data changes. [B]"NET takes into account game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses[/B]. It's both a results-driven and predictive metric." [/QUOTE]