UCONN Ban Appeal Denied | The Boneyard

UCONN Ban Appeal Denied

Status
Not open for further replies.

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,204
Reaction Score
55,984
is it still going to go through the NCAA for a decision... i know the committee on academic performance denied them but it sounds like theres still more to it... am i reading this wrong?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,924
Reaction Score
3,354
any releases from the NCAA? I'd love for them to bless us with their almighty rationale on this one.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,204
Reaction Score
55,984
#UConn: As of now, Huskies are ineligible to play in 2013 NCAA Tournament, but that could change if the criteria to measure APR is changed
i think that answers my question... bc the end of the statement makes it sound that they can still reverse it
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
1,458
Reaction Score
1,874
BSPN just sent out a text that said this is UConn's "final" appeal. Not like they don't get things wrong from time to time though.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,818
Reaction Score
26,397
seriously, f the ncaa. i really do hope uconn goes down swinging......take this as an opportunity to show what a fraud the ncaa really is.
 

Dann

#4hunnid
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
9,901
Reaction Score
7,180
if your wondering what the fire is on 95 2night, its my couch.
 

phillionaire

esta noche somos mantequilla
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,655
Reaction Score
13,308
The NCAA is doing a fine job looking out for the "student-athlete's" best interests
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,369
Reaction Score
13,971
I thought UConn had two appeals to the waiver rejection. The first being to the full committee (whatever it's called that the UHart President runs), then a subsequent appeal to the head of that committee (which would have been the UHart President).
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,158
Reaction Score
6,437
We could still get in if the NCAA uses the most recent APR scores, but judging on how we've been treated all year, I don't see that happening either. This is some serious bull, especially considering that other schools have had their exact same appeal accepted. With this news, I'd be shocked if Lamb stayed and surprised if Drummond stuck around. I don't know that there will be any other transfers, but this whole situation is messed up.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
"When this change in legislation was adopted by the NCAA Board in October 2011 and made effective for the 2012-13 academic year, it gave the illusion that institutions had time to adjust to the legislation. Yet the data had already been submitted under a different penalty structure, one that would not have excluded our men's basketball team from participating in the post-season," said Manuel. "The approach to APR marks the first time in the history of the NCAA that it has ever implemented an academic rule significantly impacting current student-athletes without allowing the members time to adjust to the adoption of the legislation.
"In recent months, CAP chairperson and University of Hartford President Walter Harrison has been quoted as saying that CAP wanted to provide institutions with `a chance to adjust'. In actuality, these changes were a retroactive application of the rules. It remains the belief of the University of Connecticut that CAP and the Board of Directors should consider delaying the effective date of the implementation for all institutions to 2013-14, and/or use the APR scores from the 2011-12 academic year to determine postseason eligibility for the 2012-13 year."
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
14
Reaction Score
10
correct me if I'm wrong all you people who are more legally educated than i am but doesn't the university have grounds to make a pretty strong lawsuit against this bs
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,204
Reaction Score
55,984
"When this change in legislation was adopted by the NCAA Board in October 2011 and made effective for the 2012-13 academic year, it gave the illusion that institutions had time to adjust to the legislation. Yet the data had already been submitted under a different penalty structure, one that would not have excluded our men's basketball team from participating in the post-season," said Manuel. "The approach to APR marks the first time in the history of the NCAA that it has ever implemented an academic rule significantly impacting current student-athletes without allowing the members time to adjust to the adoption of the legislation.
"In recent months, CAP chairperson and University of Hartford President Walter Harrison has been quoted as saying that CAP wanted to provide institutions with `a chance to adjust'. In actuality, these changes were a retroactive application of the rules. It remains the belief of the University of Connecticut that CAP and the Board of Directors should consider delaying the effective date of the implementation for all institutions to 2013-14, and/or use the APR scores from the 2011-12 academic year to determine postseason eligibility for the 2012-13 year."
yeah thats what I'm confused by
 

UCweCONN

Former Poster
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,875
Reaction Score
6,606
No matter what, this latest action will kill any hope of landing any decent recruits this Spring and probably be the deciding factor for Lamb and lead to another transfer or two. JC will fill out the roster with JC transfers or lesser recruits just to have warm bodies next season and this is only going to compound the problem. I can now relate to the persecution that Jerry Tarkanian was subjected to. The university seriously needs to not so subtly advise the NCAA of it's intention to sue. It's a crime if they haven't done so already. From reading the university's response, it's sounds like they're accepting this or am I reading it wrong?
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,818
Reaction Score
26,397
"When this change in legislation was adopted by the NCAA Board in October 2011 and made effective for the 2012-13 academic year, it gave the illusion that institutions had time to adjust to the legislation. Yet the data had already been submitted under a different penalty structure, one that would not have excluded our men's basketball team from participating in the post-season," said Manuel. "The approach to APR marks the first time in the history of the NCAA that it has ever implemented an academic rule significantly impacting current student-athletes without allowing the members time to adjust to the adoption of the legislation.
"In recent months, CAP chairperson and University of Hartford President Walter Harrison has been quoted as saying that CAP wanted to provide institutions with `a chance to adjust'. In actuality, these changes were a retroactive application of the rules. It remains the belief of the University of Connecticut that CAP and the Board of Directors should consider delaying the effective date of the implementation for all institutions to 2013-14, and/or use the APR scores from the 2011-12 academic year to determine postseason eligibility for the 2012-13 year."

that is simply amazing......i wonder if the scholarship players, not the school, can file a class action law suit.
 

UCweCONN

Former Poster
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,875
Reaction Score
6,606
correct me if I'm wrong all you people who are more legally educated than i am but doesn't the university have grounds to make a pretty strong lawsuit against this bs
Or can the players sue?
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,369
Reaction Score
13,971
No matter what, this latest action will kill any hope of landing any decent recruits this Spring and probably be the deciding factor for Lamb and lead to another transfer or two. JC will fill out the roster with JC transfers or lesser recruits just to have warm bodies next season and this is only going to compound the problem. I can now relate to the persecution that Jerry Tarkanian was subjected to. The university seriously needs to not so subtly advise the NCAA of it's intention to sue. It's a crime if they haven't done so already. From reading the university's response, it's sounds like they're accepting this or am I reading it wrong?

How exactly would that help them? The transfers (Oriakhi excluded) would have to sit out a year anyway. Why not just redshirt at UConn if you want 4 years of trying to go to the NCAA's? If the goal is to get PT to go to the NBA early, then might as well stay at UConn because you won't be playing at all if you transfer.
 

tykurez

For Your Health
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
2,880
Reaction Score
12,527
6o98V.gif
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
No matter what, this latest action will kill any hope of landing any decent recruits this Spring and probably be the deciding factor for Lamb and lead to another transfer or two. JC will fill out the roster with JC transfers or lesser recruits just to have warm bodies next season and this is only going to compound the problem. I can now relate to the persecution that Jerry Tarkanian was subjected to. The university seriously needs to not so subtly advise the NCAA of it's intention to sue. It's a crime if they haven't done so already. From reading the university's response, it's sounds like they're accepting this or am I reading it wrong?

How does the university response sound like they're accepting this? Manuel is pretty clearly calling out the NCAA on how absurd their methodology is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
340
Guests online
2,502
Total visitors
2,842

Forum statistics

Threads
160,167
Messages
4,219,687
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom