Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Carnac, post: 3718131, member: 5798"] My reply was to Alydar's query about a few elite coaches: "[B]The problem I see is that a few elite level coaches like to talk about promoting wcbb but when they have the chance to schedule games with a high level of public interest they demur", [/B]not necessarily Kim. But if the shoe fits................. Of course Kim is not in jeopardy of losing her job. She just won a natty. She's good for another 6-10 years. My narrative asked the question about [B]THE AVERAGE COACH"[/B]. I did not mention Kim. You're right, there is no reason a coach can't do both, but do they? I don't make their schedules. they do!! Ask them why they don't. It is what it is!! Kim habitually schedules "soft" non-competitive teams she knows her teams can beat, so that Baylor can begin each season with a 10-13/0 record. It's no accident. She's done that for years. So do other coaches. Maybe to the extent she does, but they do. Coaches lose their jobs every year because they don't win enough games to keep the AD and the administration happy. Again, I did not say or suggest that Mulkey was in danger of losing her job. I used the term "coaches" in a [B]general[/B] sense. Somehow you read it differently. I don't think you will be as offended by my post if you read it in the context it was written in. Finally..........allow me to be crystal clear, I absolutely positively have no issue with Kim Mulkey, Baylor or any of its players. I don't have anything for or against Kim or her program. I don't follow Baylor WBB. I'm a UConn WBB fan........period!!! [B]In Geno I trust!![/B] I don't follow/care about any other WCBB team. :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,480

Messages: 4,397,790

Members: 10,213

Latest member: MurrDog