Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
UConn #1 in NET rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 3817512, member: 1673"] This along with another computer generated list is puzzling. That other list holds that the Pac-12 is the fifth best conference, just ahead of the Big East. How does a conference go from being the best to the worst of the P-5 in one season, particularly when many of the teams are ranked high by voters? This is a case where I am inclined to believe the subjective voters over objective algorithms, but why? At one time the Pac-12 was consistently rated the worst of the P-5 due to its relative isolation west of the Rockies. As long as Stanford was the only powerhouse they were not playing enough good teams east of the Rockies to boost their ratings ... or to get the experience they needed to perform well in tournaments. This changed with the influx of good coaches, competition for being the best in conference and expansion of their territory east of the Rockies. I wonder, and this is pure conjecture, if they are "back where they started" for this one year because of Covid. Are they not playing enough teams east of the Rockies, where all the other P-5 powerhouses are located? Otherwise, I just cannot understand how they can be ranked the worst P-5 when they seem to have the most power programs this year. This contrasts with the SEC, now ranked the top P-5, while only SC and perhaps TAMU seem to be high performers. Have they played the most OOC games with other P-5 powerhouses? Once again, pure conjecture. The NET rankings would not suffer as much from a lack of OOC interchange. This could explain why the Pac-12 can suffer in the ranking of conferences, yet its members are doing well with NET. Meanwhile, in our case, DePaul and Villanova are "quality enough" for one of the components and would not influence the other one. Still more conjecture on my part, but the bottom line is what everyone is concluding this season, all the metrics we might otherwise respect are now suspect this particular year. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,488
Messages
4,398,316
Members
10,212
Latest member
MurrDog
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
UConn #1 in NET rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom