I am confused, So Cori can beat Kelly which has a talented squad but she can't beat OSU? Kiki Rice is very, very good but Cori does need to establish some type of offense and can't just roll the ball out onto the court and let them play. We keep hearing how "great UCLA will be" yet it never materializes. Certain teams have their calling cards-OSU was always defense, same for Arizona, Oregon was offense, Stanford is basketball IQ. What the heck is UCLA's? She's been there 12 years now and she really hasn't accomplished much given the quality of the recruits-3 Sweet 16 appearances, 1 WNIT title and the WNIT Semi-Finals last year. I am reminded of the Wendy's commercials from years ago-"where's the beef?"
Compared to Kelly who took over an abysmal Ducks program 35-59 the 3 years prior to his arrival, (UCLA was 72-26 the previous 3 years under Nikki Fargas so talent was there), Cori has not measured up. Kelly won the PAC12 3 times and finished 2nd once, Cori has tied for 2nd once as her best finish. So, yeah, the comparison isn't really Close (see what I did there?
).
While I certainly am questioning how good a coach Kelly really is, I know that Cori can't coach a game having watched her blow games to inferior talent far too many times. Nice lady, great recruiter and spokesperson but as an actual coach, NO, jus NO.