diggerfoot
Humanity Hiker
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,601
- Reaction Score
- 9,036
I did a double take when I first saw the turnover number for St. Francis. Only eighteen! Transposing that to a game with a normal amount of possessions that's more like 10-12, excellent for a mid-major playing uptempo ball against an elite major. But then it occurred to me they essentially played with an 8 second shot clock, there wasn't a lot of time for a turnover to happen. But then it occurred to me they never deviated from that strategy, UConn knew what to expect, yet St. Francis still carried out their game plan in pretty much all respects except making their shots.
That was a disciplined effort by St. Francis; a different kind of discipline albeit, but one that still reflects coaching and execution, not to mention hard work. If our players were voicing the opinion of getting tired in the first quarter you can bet theirs were as well, yet they still worked hard at executing their plan.
The second observation was the lack of regret by the St. Francis players in the post game presser. We understandably view this from a fan's point of view, but the most important view is, or should be, the student athlete. Rather than being embarrassed as so many fans proclaimed is what they felt, they proclaimed they had fun! They played the way they were coached, a style they presumably enjoyed all the way to a conference championship. They were grateful both for being in the tournament, never a given for a mid-major, and for playing an uptempo game in which they actually put over 50 points up on the board.
They only made 10 - 57 threes. You can not expect them to make enough to win or even enough to make the game close. But let's say they had a respectable and reasonable conversion of 20 - 57. Now the margin is under sixty, in an uptempo game where margins would be exaggerated anyways, better than what elite major Mississippi State did when they first went against us in the tournament.
That was a disciplined effort by St. Francis; a different kind of discipline albeit, but one that still reflects coaching and execution, not to mention hard work. If our players were voicing the opinion of getting tired in the first quarter you can bet theirs were as well, yet they still worked hard at executing their plan.
The second observation was the lack of regret by the St. Francis players in the post game presser. We understandably view this from a fan's point of view, but the most important view is, or should be, the student athlete. Rather than being embarrassed as so many fans proclaimed is what they felt, they proclaimed they had fun! They played the way they were coached, a style they presumably enjoyed all the way to a conference championship. They were grateful both for being in the tournament, never a given for a mid-major, and for playing an uptempo game in which they actually put over 50 points up on the board.
They only made 10 - 57 threes. You can not expect them to make enough to win or even enough to make the game close. But let's say they had a respectable and reasonable conversion of 20 - 57. Now the margin is under sixty, in an uptempo game where margins would be exaggerated anyways, better than what elite major Mississippi State did when they first went against us in the tournament.