Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 2821593, member: 1673"] Lol. I've seen other threads where you fault dogmatic opinions on our fan board; then offer your own dogmatic opinion. The fact that you swap dogmatic opinions for dogmatic opinions would not be noteworthy, that's normal discourse in our society at this point, except that you fault ours while being on a UConn fan board. When a fan offers a dogmatic, unsubstantiated opinion on their own board it's normal fan behavior and can be considered part of the social interaction. When it's offered on an opponent's board it's antisocial, whether you intend that or not depends on your EQ. However, this is a case where actual empirical evidence comes to play that can either support or refute a dogmatic opinion. The "Griner impact" garnered precisely one NCAA championship, with another first team AA on the squad. The "Taurasi impact" garnered three championships, two of them dominated by underclassmen with no other first team AAs on the squad. Griner has only won WNBA championships with Taurasi as a teammate; Taurasi has won one without Griner. The only thing you've got to go on is that Griner is a really, really good player who is really, really tall. That must be all it takes to make teammates better in your view, because that's the only supporting evidence you have. [/QUOTE]