- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,500
- Reaction Score
- 55,525
The suit also follows from the previous year in which the female AD was pushed out.
Boy, there is simply no good way to spin that one...
In a word: Yes there is. But, before doing so, it is first necessary to remove the little hand grenade put into the comment in the first place. Referring to the matter as one of "spin" can be considered (I said can be not is) loaded and demeaning of the concept of pursuing equality and equal treatment and opposing job retaliation. So, if one has a concern, there are better words than "spin".
Here's how UT, or at least its women's basketball program may benefit from this action by Moshak.
First, it is important to do what can be done to overcome the serious and ongoing pattern of gender based pay discrimination.
Second, it is easy to overlook the seriousness of unequal pay when an elite program is involved. The assumption is too easily made that working for an elite program means everything is honky dory when, in fact, everything isn't.
Third, female basketball players know or should know the pot at the end of the rainbow in the WNBA and in commercial endorsements and in professional jobs of all kinds is a lot smaller for them than it is for male counterparts. It is wrong to overlook, sugarcoat and/or rationalize those facts away by crying broke or some other rationalization.
Fourth, by coming to UT, instead of, say, another program that pretends gender discrimination doesn't exist or downplays it, an elite recruit can be seen as taking a stand in favor of equal treatment. If UT develops an environment of vigilance in favor of equality, as expressed by staff, former staff AND players, a "coolness" element could easily develop or be nurtured.
Finally, this perspective can be put rhetorically. If you were an elite player or her parent, and if you were from, say, the lower income segment of the population (which is larger now than it has been and growing), or if you were simply progressively oriented, would you want to play in a hotbed of advocacy in favor of gender inequality; 'where the action is' so to speak? Let me know if you want my answer were it my granddaughters...
So, yes, there is, indeed, a very positive way to put this matter.
I wonder if Holly will take it and run with it? :-o
In a word: Yes there is. But, before doing so, it is first necessary to remove the little hand grenade put into the comment in the first place. Referring to the matter as one of "spin" can be considered (I said can be not is) loaded and demeaning of the concept of pursuing equality and equal treatment and opposing job retaliation. So, if one has a concern, there are better words than "spin".
Wow, this means that they now have a new AD, a new head coach, a new strength and conditioning coach AND a new athletic trainer.
This ain't your momma's Tennessee.
Some like it "progressive" (i.e., change, new and improved, hip, cool, moving on, gettin' on up, let's get it on, mercy mercy me, burn baby, etc., if you get my drift).
Some prefer the status quo, slow, stay the same, middle of the road, stiff, staid, stogie, old, tame, timid, etc., (if you get my drift on this one, too).
And, I hasten to add for sake of clarity, no, DD, I am not talking about YOU. I am talking about progressive versus conservative interpretation of the Moshak lawsuit against UT for discrimination and retaliation.
Best regards
Eric wasn't saying Moshak was spinning the situation. He said that there's no way to make Tennessee look good in it.
But you can be happy. Your streak of thinking your fellow Boneyarders are a contemptible bunch continues to be unblemished.
" and has created "a testosterone wall" that denies women equal pay and the plaintiffs the opportunity to advance by working in men's athletics.
I do wish posters would ask me if their interpretations are correct before coming to a conclusion.
I would have been perfectly happy to respond to a post that said:
"JP, do you think your fellow boneyarders are a contemptible bunch? It seems to me you do. Care to comment?"
There are, of course, many ways to do that, some fairer than others. Note, for instance, I took care to use the phrase "can be not is" in making sure I was not coming to a conclusion about the use of the word "spin."
I really mean no harm. Are my comments thought provoking? I hope so. But, I'm only engaging in dialogue. That said, I here acknowledge that words can sting. Best reply to a comment that offends, is one that refutes.
So, with that said, let me conclude:
I hold my fellow boneyarders in high esteem, value their knowledge of the game and cherish that we are all in the midst of a sports dynasty.
If there is anything unclear about my high praise for boneyarders, let me know and I will try to clarify my high praise for and appreciation of boneyarders.
None of what you posted has to do with what I posted.
I'm not even going to respond to the rest of your post because your comments were beyond silly. It would be the equivalent of comparing how UCONN might benefit if Geno retired under a cloud of ugliness regarding the university, and frankly, made no sense at all.In a word: Yes there is. But, before doing so, it is first necessary to remove the little hand grenade put into the comment in the first place. Referring to the matter as one of "spin" can be considered (I said can be not is) loaded and demeaning of the concept of pursuing equality and equal treatment and opposing job retaliation. So, if one has a concern, there are better words than "spin"
... by coming to UT, instead of, say, another program that pretends gender discrimination doesn't exist or downplays it, an elite recruit can be seen as taking a stand in favor of equal treatment. If UT develops an environment of vigilance in favor of equality, as expressed by staff, former staff AND players, a "coolness" element could easily develop or be nurtured ...
Would you please go though and praise each one individually. Say 5- 10 words each? Alphabetical would be nice.I do wish posters would ask me if their interpretations are correct before coming to a conclusion.
I would have been perfectly happy to respond to a post that said:
"JP, do you think your fellow boneyarders are a contemptible bunch? It seems to me you do. Care to comment?"
There are, of course, many ways to do that, some fairer than others. Note, for instance, I took care to use the phrase "can be not is" in making sure I was not coming to a conclusion about the use of the word "spin."
I really mean no harm. Are my comments thought provoking? I hope so. But, I'm only engaging in dialogue. That said, I here acknowledge that words can sting. Best reply to a comment that offends, is one that refutes.
So, with that said, let me conclude:
I hold my fellow boneyarders in high esteem, value their knowledge of the game and cherish that we are all in the midst of a sports dynasty.
If there is anything unclear about my high praise for boneyarders, let me know and I will try to clarify my high praise for and appreciation of boneyarders.
I'm not even going to respond to the rest of your post because your comments were beyond silly. It would be the equivalent of comparing how UCONN might benefit if Geno retired under a cloud of ugliness regarding the university, and frankly, made no sense at all.
“Due to the overall atmosphere since I raised issues of equality at the University of Tennessee and given the university’s unwillingness to address the issues of discrimination and retaliation, I cannot continue my association with the university’s athletic department,” Moshak said in the statement.
Will it affect recruiting? Highly unlikely. But is it another blemish on the University with regards to the issue of discrimination and how women are treated at Tennessee? Of course. And for the record, not a single poster on the Summitt believes this is a good thing.