Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HuskyNan, post: 4005349, member: 4"] If Richardson were the, say, 200th best sprinter in the country, would you be as outraged? I‘m not addressing [USER=6911]@Fairfield Fan[/USER] but musing, why are rules applied to top performers deemed stupid but the average schmoe can get bounced for the same reason without any fanfare whatsoever? We’re hearing about Richardson but she’s a star in her sport. Who else failed the test and why haven’t we heard anything about[I] them[/I] to stir up the outrage machine on Twitter? Is the anti-pot rule bad or is it only bad when it affects a star? [/QUOTE]