Today's Press Conference | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Today's Press Conference

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ironically, 6 years ago a HC went for a power run from deep inside his own territory on 4th down to beat Pitt. It might have saved the season and put us opn another trajectory. I recall the OL getting credit for saying, let's go for it and run it. Having faith in your team to deliver in a big game is commendable. Now, having said that, I amstill not sure I'll ever understand that ending. A shot at pulling off a W in a game we should have lost by 20+ was a huge setback. The lack of explanations, the confusing and meandering storyline (recall he originally thought it was 3rd down), and frankly the lack of hard questions being asked remind me again why we are not in the P5.

HCBD has been a revelation for a program that had hit rock bottom. He has the vibe back, the program on the uptick, and the promise of better days ahead. But how much better? Are we recruiting talent that can compete with good P5 teams, do we understand the evolution of the game (towards more explosive plays), and can we adjust on the fly (in a game or within schemes across a year)? I so want to believe that the trajectory upward will continue, but in Y3 I expected more. The OL remains a huge problem; the O seems to think games start after the 1/2, the D struggles to get off the field quickly, the specials are, well, not special, and the recruiting does not align w/a P5 program or even that of the top of the AAC. Have we truly solved any of our key issues, other than a feel good atmosphere for the players?

6 years ago against Pitt, the call that gave us the best chance to win the game was going for it on 4th down.

Last Saturday, Diaco's call didn't give us the best odds to win that game. You can't compare these 2 situations at all. There is context to both situations. They didn't occur in a vacuum.
 
These two situations couldn't be more different.

Jordan Todman averaged 5 yards per carry that year. Our defense wasn't getting stops that game, and everyone at that game (or watching) knew that if we gave Pitt the ball back, they'd probably score again, and only needed a field goal. They scored 21 of their 28 points in the second half. They scored with 5 minutes left in the third, 13 seconds left in the third, and their 4th quarter TD came less than 2 minutes after getting the ball back.

That 2010 team lined up on 4th down, everyone knew Todman was getting the ball, and they couldn't stop it.

Week one we lined up on 3rd and short against Maine and lost a yard. That 2010 team could have told Maine which direction we were running, who was pulling, and what the snap count was, and we still would have gotten 5 yards.
 
From running backs to offensive line to defense that 2010 team as well as 2009 ( might have been the best had it not been for the Jazz incident) were really good football teams. Our current running backs need to improve by 50% just to qualify to carry Todman or Brown's equipment.
 
6 years ago against Pitt, the call that gave us the best chance to win the game was going for it on 4th down.

Last Saturday, Diaco's call didn't give us the best odds to win that game. You can't compare these 2 situations at all. There is context to both situations. They didn't occur in a vacuum.

If I remember correctly, our defense was not having one of its better days. A punt there and we expected Pitt to easily move in for a score. Not sure it was much of a difficult choice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,328
Messages
4,564,277
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom