Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Deadrody, post: 2478893, member: 937"] Indeed. The idea that UConn - or anyone else - is getting "noticed" by the committee because they don't have any "bad losses" (and let's be honest - losing to a mid major is a BAD loss) is NUTS. They notice big wins and bad losses. End of story. The only way their assertion makes any sense is by logical deduction. Since the committee notices big wins and bad losses, the fact that UConn has avoided a bad loss is - by deduction - "noticed". But in truth, it's not. And, like you say, it's not even like bad losses would be a primary factor in the committee's decision making. When it comes down to seeding, or the last 4 teams that get at-large bids, THEN they may consider who had a bad loss and who didn't. [/QUOTE]