Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jazz, post: 3819995, member: 10942"] I took another look at the 2nd Qtr to see if you have a point there: No you don’t. AG left the game at 6:43 down by 1. She is back in at about 2:05 and the score is tied. AE blows a layup – is that AG’s fault and then TEN gets a three off the break with EW late on defense= 5 pt swing and nothing to do with AG. Then AG gives a nice pass to AE and she again misses the layup AND both FTs. Is that AG’s fault? That is 7 points we lost in the score column and nothing to do with AG. In fact, AG gave a sweet pass to AE on the break and we got nothing out of it. Down at HT by 1. Same as it was throughout the 2nd. Now in the 3rd: AG gets her 4th foul and we are still down by 1 and at the end of the 3rd without AG on the floor, we are down by 4. No AG and we are down a further 3 points. Now in the 4th: we go on a run where CW and EW hit 3 threes, AE hits a lucky bank shot and Liv gets a block leading to the break for 2 more. Are you saying none of that would happen if AG was in the game? AG and AE essentially play the same position in a similar way although AG stretches the defense a bit more. Maybe AG doesn’t make the lucky bank shot from the foul line..... AG in the game at 8 pt lead with 3:12 to go. CW travels – is that on AG? AM in the game also. During this time AG got an offensive rebound and helped tip the ball out for another offensive possession. She goes out at and we are up 4. PB back in. Back in at +5 and we win by 6. You are certainly have no point with regard to the 2nd qtr and I’d argue the 4th had nothing to do with AG being out. We just finally hit some threes, Liv finally made a couple plays and AE hit a lucky bank shot. No cause and effect there with regard to AG's presence on the court. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,488

Messages: 4,398,359

Members: 10,212

Latest member: MurrDog