Push UConn to the top and drop Cinci, Arkansas and Syracuse to the third spot.
whats the selection criteria? the P5, the BE, a few aac schools, a couple ivies, some random mid majors like charleston and pepperdine??
how the heck is New Mexico St in tier 4? that one jumped out at me
Putting any one-time champion in Tier 2 ruins that tier. Buh bye 'cuse, Gtown, 'Zona, Virginia, Buckeyes, Arkansas.
I would go so far as to say Tier 2 should be 3x Champs, or 10 or more FF to be in that category- IU, UConn, Nova, MSU, Louisville.
If Arkansas is higher than Gonzaga after the last 20 years, then I'm watching the wrong sport.
Historically Arkansas is a much better program and it's not even close. They've actually won a championship, and have been to six FF's. Gonzaga has one FF as its resume's lead off bullet.
That's interesting - I hadn't thought about being that "strict" but it is a good way to separate UConn.
These questions are always interesting because you necessarily have to take into account history but also recent history. UCLA has stunk for 15 years more or less, had a few F4s and titles 25 years ago but otherwise they're like Indiana. Yet they sort of have to be tier 1 still.
UCLA is the ultimate "Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the rest of the play?" program. Outside of a 15 year run, they are nothing special. But that 12 year run is the greatest run college history.
Yale would be Tier 1 in football. Point being, these lists are useless.
It’s like this guy is placing like a 80% weight on pre-2000 results, 10% post-2000, and 10% fictional results.If Arkansas is higher than Gonzaga after the last 20 years, then I'm watching the wrong sport.
Don't do drugs.
Please feel free to discuss but I will start with the obvious that Syracuse is to high!