- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016
- Messages
- 5,306
- Reaction Score
- 28,416
Performance Art: that’s Rocky’s terrific characterization of what UConn does when it’s playing at the top of its game.
Recently, my brother-in-law (?$@#*!) started picking on me for supporting a “front-runner.” I tried to explain that, while UConn’s winning is great, it’s really a second-derivative of why I watch. I watch because it’s a thing of beauty (and a joy forever). But brothers-in-law have a unique way of getting under your skin, so I carried this around with me for days.
I started thinking about my wife’s utter fascination with Roger Federer in his prime (and our mutual fascination with Tiger Woods before his wife mistook his face for a golf ball). Of course, their domination was part of the fascination. But again, the dominance was the result, not the cause, of why we watched. As Bobby Jones paid the ultimate tribute to his young successor, declaring that, “Nicklaus played a game with which I am not familiar,” Nicklaus paid it forward, bestowing on the young Woods the same compliment. You might imagine Rod Laver saying the same thing about Roger Federer.
And Henry Iba (creator of the motion offense) and Bobby Knight (developer of the same), etc. saying the same thing about Geno and his amazing team. At its best, it is a game with which we are not familiar, because it is more than a game. It is a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It is an art form—performance art.
Take that, brother-in-law (?$@#*!).
Recently, my brother-in-law (?$@#*!) started picking on me for supporting a “front-runner.” I tried to explain that, while UConn’s winning is great, it’s really a second-derivative of why I watch. I watch because it’s a thing of beauty (and a joy forever). But brothers-in-law have a unique way of getting under your skin, so I carried this around with me for days.
I started thinking about my wife’s utter fascination with Roger Federer in his prime (and our mutual fascination with Tiger Woods before his wife mistook his face for a golf ball). Of course, their domination was part of the fascination. But again, the dominance was the result, not the cause, of why we watched. As Bobby Jones paid the ultimate tribute to his young successor, declaring that, “Nicklaus played a game with which I am not familiar,” Nicklaus paid it forward, bestowing on the young Woods the same compliment. You might imagine Rod Laver saying the same thing about Roger Federer.
And Henry Iba (creator of the motion offense) and Bobby Knight (developer of the same), etc. saying the same thing about Geno and his amazing team. At its best, it is a game with which we are not familiar, because it is more than a game. It is a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It is an art form—performance art.
Take that, brother-in-law (?$@#*!).