Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 2969612, member: 3535"] Mine and Aussie' do relate to the thread. The OP mentioned that there was past discussions that there were gripings of Lou's game vs OU. The OP asked for "thoughts" regarding Lou and her learning a new role because she is supposedly key in his or her opinion was worth a discussion. Aussie seemed to believe that Lou is not key and has had the benefit of being fortunate of geno allowing her to play the 3 at the expense of Collier and Walker. I'm not defining who is key I don't know but I was sticking up for Los by suggesting Lou is the logical 3. Aussie seemed to imply that los was saying because lou should be the go to player it means she is the best. Imo being a go-to doesn't mean your the best. I think the discussions between aussiee and I were definitely aligned with the thread. He thinks she isn't necessarily the best candidate for a go to player and you could put others there - while I think because she is the logical best choice for wing - thus she's the best option from the outside to provide opportunities for each player more than Collier or Walker could be. I tend to think all are key but Lou must be the 3. And Gabby and Maya relate to the OP's thread because you could argue in the past Maya as an undersized 4 was the key - a player such as Collier (imo is similar to maya) can be or you can move her Walker to 3 and then they could have more opportunities to become key. There is the disagreements. Los invited a broad conversation. Sometimes in these broad conversations you need to bring up the past to make a point. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,394

Messages: 4,394,187

Members: 10,208

Latest member: jskwrite