- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 12,858
- Reaction Score
- 21,381
I have read a number of concerns about whether Edsall will be able to recruit to the AAC like he did to the Big East. To me there are a number of silly assumptions behind these views. First and foremost is the idea that because Diaco didn't recruit well Edsall won't. The problem there of course is that Diaco did lots of things poorly. He was just not a good head coach so just because his recruiting was poor it doesn't follow that Edsalls will be too. In fact in his first stint Edsall recruited pretty well. Not high ranked but better than their tanking talents. Pasaualoni landed a pretty well regarded class in his only true year of recruiting too.
Second is the idea that we aren't in a great recruiting area (although the same folks who say that tend to be the ones who want to land every CT kid) Well ok if you assume that kids from New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida, Washington Baltimore and Virginia and the Carolinas only want to go to college within commuting distance of mommy be daddy that might be a problem. Fortunately it isn't true. Edsall will be looking at all theses areas where we've had success before and likely some new ones too like Chicago and Detroit where we've been active recently. And of course Florida.where he can sell that you'll play near home every year.
Finally it ignores what a solid coach and recruiter can do especially if the program is making progress. Temple and Memphis are great examples. Temple is in PA but it is also in a tough section of Philly and was awful for many years. Almost Rutgersian. Based on the location theory of recruiting Rutgers should be if not Alabama at least Michigan. Instead they lost to Michigan by something like 75.
Bottom line is that much of the concern about recruiting is overblown. The right guy, and based on past performance Edsall seems the right guy, can recruit at UConn.
Second is the idea that we aren't in a great recruiting area (although the same folks who say that tend to be the ones who want to land every CT kid) Well ok if you assume that kids from New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida, Washington Baltimore and Virginia and the Carolinas only want to go to college within commuting distance of mommy be daddy that might be a problem. Fortunately it isn't true. Edsall will be looking at all theses areas where we've had success before and likely some new ones too like Chicago and Detroit where we've been active recently. And of course Florida.where he can sell that you'll play near home every year.
Finally it ignores what a solid coach and recruiter can do especially if the program is making progress. Temple and Memphis are great examples. Temple is in PA but it is also in a tough section of Philly and was awful for many years. Almost Rutgersian. Based on the location theory of recruiting Rutgers should be if not Alabama at least Michigan. Instead they lost to Michigan by something like 75.
Bottom line is that much of the concern about recruiting is overblown. The right guy, and based on past performance Edsall seems the right guy, can recruit at UConn.