This may be the best season ever to have no seniors. | The Boneyard

This may be the best season ever to have no seniors.

HuskylnSC

North is a direction; South is a lifestyle
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
2,350
Reaction Score
11,937
Imagine the recruiting logjam that would occur if Geno had 3 seniors on this team and suppose two of them were hungry enough for a national championship that they decided to stay. There have already been numerous posts on this board and the others I peruse stating there won't be enough minutes for everyone (which is not the case) and other schools are talking about the transfers that are supposedly in UConn's future. Six freshmen (one walkon) this year and four next year, though a necessary replenishment of troops, gives a lopsided recruiting profile. We may be the only top tier team that is not looking to juggle recruiting and lineups next year.
 

Huskee11

The Sultan
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
1,874
Reaction Score
15,878
It is becoming more and more apparent that enacting this rule was a good idea. It will create some confusion, uncertainty, and headaches, but it is fair to the players.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,397
Reaction Score
69,741
Imagine the recruiting logjam that would occur if Geno had 3 seniors on this team and suppose two of them were hungry enough for a national championship that they decided to stay. There have already been numerous posts on this board and the others I peruse stating there won't be enough minutes for everyone (which is not the case) and other schools are talking about the transfers that are supposedly in UConn's future. Six freshmen (one walkon) this year and four next year, though a necessary replenishment of troops, gives a lopsided recruiting profile. We may be the only top tier team that is not looking to juggle recruiting and lineups next year.
Having no seniors doesn't eliminate the potential for a roster logjam; it only delays it by an extra year. This season will not count against anyone's four years of eligibility or "five-year clock."
 

MilfordHusky

Voice of Reason
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
37,099
Reaction Score
125,279
Some folks criticized Megan for leaving early. I wasn't thrilled about her decision, but I supported it once she made it public.

She played in the W, but was still recovering from Covid and didn't excel. Now she is playing in Hungary. She will earn 2 paychecks, while her former teammates wait around to see if/when they can play. In retrospect, Megan's decision now look brilliant.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,721
Reaction Score
26,194
Having no seniors doesn't eliminate the potential for a roster logjam; it only delays it by an extra year. This season will not count against anyone's four years of eligibility or "five-year clock."

Lately the trend at UConn is to leave at 22. At least among WNBA 1st rounders. I think the "logjam" is a calculated move by Geno who has been caught short by players moving on to the pros with eligibility. Tuck, Stevens, Walker.
 

Argonaut

No, not that Providence.
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
2,509
Reaction Score
22,622
Lately the trend at UConn is to leave at 22. At least among WNBA 1st rounders. I think the "logjam" is a calculated move by Geno who has been caught short by players moving on to the pros with eligibility. Tuck, Stevens, Walker.

In all fairness, Tuck and Stevens left with a degree. IMO, there is a huge difference in leaving college having only used three years of eligibility but with a degree and leaving college after three years without a degree.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
9,874
Reaction Score
29,425
Lately the trend at UConn is to leave at 22. At least among WNBA 1st rounders. I think the "logjam" is a calculated move by Geno who has been caught short by players moving on to the pros with eligibility. Tuck, Stevens, Walker.
In all fairness, Tuck and Stevens left with a degree. IMO, there is a huge difference in leaving college having only used three years of eligibility but with a degree and leaving college after three years without a degree.
Napheesa could have gone after 3 years, but stayed.
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
17,002
Reaction Score
151,099
So here are the numbers. If everyone comes back next year, along with 4 incoming freshmen, that’s 15 players, or 14 scholarships unless Geno awards a scholarship to Autumn, which would then put UConn at the NCAA maximum of 15 scholarships.

While unlikely, all 15 players could return for the 2022-23 season. At this point, UConn has only 1 verbal from Ice which could conceivably increase UConn’s roster to 16, while hamstringing additional recruiting efforts.

Teams with “pro caliber” players like UConn will likely lose players like Liv, Evina & Christyn, who project as 1st round picks and will have completed their degrees. But there will be a lot of schools where logjams will result in either major transfers and/or coaches forced to rescind scholarships.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,721
Reaction Score
26,194
In all fairness, Tuck and Stevens left with a degree. IMO, there is a huge difference in leaving college having only used three years of eligibility but with a degree and leaving college after three years without a degree.

True about Tuck and Stevens but still they left to go pro. Degree or not, the money will too much to refuse. Degrees can be finished on-line. Look at the UConn male stars who cashed in after 2 or 3 years. All we said was thanks for the memories. It'll be the same with the women. Calhoun had the smarts to tell them when they were ready for the pros. He lost the player but others came there because they trusted Cahoun to teach what they needed to learn and to tell them when. I think it has worked the same for Geno. In his own way Geno attracts talented players with an eye to be pros.

I really enjoy 4 year players. I like to root for the same guys for a while. That's one reason I prefer wb to mb. But that may be changing. One thing COVID is teaching is rolling with things. :)
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
1,095
Reaction Score
6,239
Some folks criticized Megan for leaving early. I wasn't thrilled about her decision, but I supported it once she made it public.

She played in the W, but was still recovering from Covid and didn't excel. Now she is playing in Hungary. She will earn 2 paychecks, while her former teammates wait around to see if/when they can play. In retrospect, Megan's decision now look brilliant.
Agree. It was very smart of her to leave. These players will be lucky to play 15 games.
 

Online statistics

Members online
48
Guests online
1,096
Total visitors
1,144

Forum statistics

Threads
157,831
Messages
4,122,795
Members
10,014
Latest member
NYCVET


Top Bottom