Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ScottVib, post: 4365903, member: 694"] Edsall 1.0 had established the processes that had the program set up to be generally successful. It had a high floor, but not an elite ceiling as he’d demonstrated that he was unable to or unwilling to land a consistent level of talent to move into the top tier of programs. Pasqualoni’s tenure saw the erosion of those processes and discipline resulting in the disappointment of too many close losses and bowl misses. The talent remained consistent and the team settled at the Edsall 1.0 floor despite the talent, before discipline completely fell apart costing him his job. Diaco’s tenure saw the erosion of the talent level to the point where a new floor was established along with a new much lower ceiling. Edsall 2.0 demonstrated that he hadn’t evolved along with the game in the time since his first tenure. He stubbornly tried to return to the trailer days and rebuild everything as if it were the late 90s. It failed. [/QUOTE]