- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 20,699
- Reaction Score
- 45,865
O.K., I've been making snide comments since being home, but let's see if I can somehow tie a lot of it together. First, yesterday was a brutal weather day. Unbelievably brutal. Combine the weather with the (understandably) empty stadium, the lack of quality of the opponent and the terrible display we saw of offensive football by both sides and I don't think I ever would of imagined I could have less fun at a non-blowout game than I had yesterday. It was that uncomfortable (and our team, while getting a W, played a far, far worse game than they did against Towson last year -- luckily, against a far, far worse opponent. I really do fear that we have an issue here, in that it will take HCBD time to rebuild the steaming pile of manure that he inherited, and, in terms of having a fanbase left in this conference, we may not have time. But that's for minds much greater than mine to wrestle with. One last thing -- the dog growl on third down is embarassing, paintful, and counterproductive. I won't stand on third downs if that's what they do, and I can see others reacting the same way. Guns and Roses was fine and served its purpose. If they want to change to some other cue (band playing, cheerleader prompts, whatever) I'm open to change, but what they are doing may be the worst bad idea of all bad ideas ever made by anybody. Please, someone, stop it.
The defense played very well until the one drive it gave up in the fourth Q. They pitched a shutout until the final three minutes. Did we learn anything from it? No, Stony Brook couldn't move the ball against Bryant, so we should have been able to shut them down. But that's all you can do, and but for one bad drive the D did all it could do. The NT play of Campenni and Myers was really good. Adeyami and McBride kept us from missing Pruitt. I really like Junior at LB. Ruben Frank put himself in a position a few times to make huge plays, but doesn't seem to know how to actually make the play when he gets there. Hopefully this will change. Other than Bryon Jones, could one DB start looking for the ball? How many times where they in position to make plays, but then didn't? And Obi is close, in my view, to not deserving starts. Maybe he's just one of these weekday athletes who looks good in practice, but from what he brings on Saturdays I don't get why people rave about him. Finally, in what looks like it might be a very long season at the moment, we are getting a ton of youngsters snaps and hopefully there is a payback for that in subsequent years.
Special teams, obviously, had a good day. Puyol made both FGs and did a good job on kickoffs. It looked to me like the PAT was just kicked low, but I haven't seen a replay. Wain was much, much better. Coverage was fine( someone on the punt team made a great play catching and downing a punt at the one but I couldn't see who). Oh -- and one great show of athleticism by Des Foxx probably won us the game. Note, however, that on both punts and kickoffs we are still insisting on lining up to forward, where kicks either go over our heads or on KOs we're losing forward momentum when making a catch. I don't get it.
The offense was beyond terrible. What's ironic, is that Chandler Whitmer '12 was much better than Chandler Whitmer the last two games. Chandler Whitmer last year, while a turnover machine, generally threw better than he has this year. Does that speak well of our offensive coaches? Or is it just that they have him focused on eliminating the TOs, rather than being free to throw and that is having an effect. But it is a joke to think that yesterday is all about how bad Whitmer was. The OL sucked against a D they should have been able to blow off the line. Other than Davis, Foxx and Abrans and McQuillan simply refuse to make tough catches or big plays. Geremy Davis spends way, way, way too much time off the field. And if I keep seeing us throw long 75% of the time on manageable third downs I'm going to scream (although Whitmer's lack of touch on short passes surely has something to do with it). Yesterday may have been the most embarassing offensive performance since moving into the Rent. Only the turnover show against Pitt in '08 even comes close when you realize the opponent. I am truly worried that if CC isn't playing this year we will be worse than last year.
So coaching? Again, being really bad this year is not a reflection of HCBD and his staff. And you're not going to see my overreact to the coaching any time soon. But that does not mean I understand everything. I give a full pass on the defensive subs yesterday given the heat and how the D played, but we're still playing way too many people on offense. I know that's good for experience but will players be able to get in a grove if they're not allowed to play? The fact that they viewed at least through opening day Whitmer as being in Cochran's league makes me worry about a drug problem having effected them. And the play calling (specifically continuing to throw low percentage passes yesterday instead of high percentage passes) leaves me puzzled. But, in fairness, the players seem to have bought in, and given our lack of real playmakers on both sides of the ball, that may be more important in the long term than strategy while the staff has time to build the roster. I just worry about whether, in a conference where our fans don't see any light at the end of the rainbow, we will still have a fanbase by the time the roster gets there.
I will be at a bar conference next week and will miss the Boise game. I hope fans show up, like opening night, and are ready to be enthusiastic if the game gives them a chance to. I am assuming they give CC one more week off and if he is able to play again make their stand come conference play. But we'll see.
The defense played very well until the one drive it gave up in the fourth Q. They pitched a shutout until the final three minutes. Did we learn anything from it? No, Stony Brook couldn't move the ball against Bryant, so we should have been able to shut them down. But that's all you can do, and but for one bad drive the D did all it could do. The NT play of Campenni and Myers was really good. Adeyami and McBride kept us from missing Pruitt. I really like Junior at LB. Ruben Frank put himself in a position a few times to make huge plays, but doesn't seem to know how to actually make the play when he gets there. Hopefully this will change. Other than Bryon Jones, could one DB start looking for the ball? How many times where they in position to make plays, but then didn't? And Obi is close, in my view, to not deserving starts. Maybe he's just one of these weekday athletes who looks good in practice, but from what he brings on Saturdays I don't get why people rave about him. Finally, in what looks like it might be a very long season at the moment, we are getting a ton of youngsters snaps and hopefully there is a payback for that in subsequent years.
Special teams, obviously, had a good day. Puyol made both FGs and did a good job on kickoffs. It looked to me like the PAT was just kicked low, but I haven't seen a replay. Wain was much, much better. Coverage was fine( someone on the punt team made a great play catching and downing a punt at the one but I couldn't see who). Oh -- and one great show of athleticism by Des Foxx probably won us the game. Note, however, that on both punts and kickoffs we are still insisting on lining up to forward, where kicks either go over our heads or on KOs we're losing forward momentum when making a catch. I don't get it.
The offense was beyond terrible. What's ironic, is that Chandler Whitmer '12 was much better than Chandler Whitmer the last two games. Chandler Whitmer last year, while a turnover machine, generally threw better than he has this year. Does that speak well of our offensive coaches? Or is it just that they have him focused on eliminating the TOs, rather than being free to throw and that is having an effect. But it is a joke to think that yesterday is all about how bad Whitmer was. The OL sucked against a D they should have been able to blow off the line. Other than Davis, Foxx and Abrans and McQuillan simply refuse to make tough catches or big plays. Geremy Davis spends way, way, way too much time off the field. And if I keep seeing us throw long 75% of the time on manageable third downs I'm going to scream (although Whitmer's lack of touch on short passes surely has something to do with it). Yesterday may have been the most embarassing offensive performance since moving into the Rent. Only the turnover show against Pitt in '08 even comes close when you realize the opponent. I am truly worried that if CC isn't playing this year we will be worse than last year.
So coaching? Again, being really bad this year is not a reflection of HCBD and his staff. And you're not going to see my overreact to the coaching any time soon. But that does not mean I understand everything. I give a full pass on the defensive subs yesterday given the heat and how the D played, but we're still playing way too many people on offense. I know that's good for experience but will players be able to get in a grove if they're not allowed to play? The fact that they viewed at least through opening day Whitmer as being in Cochran's league makes me worry about a drug problem having effected them. And the play calling (specifically continuing to throw low percentage passes yesterday instead of high percentage passes) leaves me puzzled. But, in fairness, the players seem to have bought in, and given our lack of real playmakers on both sides of the ball, that may be more important in the long term than strategy while the staff has time to build the roster. I just worry about whether, in a conference where our fans don't see any light at the end of the rainbow, we will still have a fanbase by the time the roster gets there.
I will be at a bar conference next week and will miss the Boise game. I hope fans show up, like opening night, and are ready to be enthusiastic if the game gives them a chance to. I am assuming they give CC one more week off and if he is able to play again make their stand come conference play. But we'll see.