Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BobbyJ, post: 5174033, member: 4250"] Note the bolded lines above. SC and Stanford stockpiling forwards in a couple of recent seasons and UConn having frontline depth 9 years ago has nothing to do with the timeframe you used here. "Last summer" and "at that time", "several top contenders" did not have 4 or 5 high level bigs and still don't. You are correct, your definition of high level bigs is considerably lower than mine. To me, high level= high impact in competitive games. Not HS ranking hype, potential, or early season stats against cupcake opponents. I don't set high expectations on that stuff and then get disappointed. I wait until they've proven they can compete and succeed against serious college competition. Like Sarah Strong has. [/QUOTE]