Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Pro Sports (MLB, NFL, NBA, etc)
The Official 2024 NY Giants Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Husky25, post: 5109649, member: 2839"] I was about to say that, for once, the $40 million dollar beneficiary didn't have a major hand in losing the game for the Giants. Then I recalled that his fumble in the 1st quarter led directly to 7 points for the Commanders, and was pretty much the scoring difference in the game. Kudos to the Commanders who played through the whistle on a possible turnover. Neither defense was lights out, but the Commanders were better in spots where they needed to be. Credit to the Giants for make adjustments and only allowing 6 points in the 2nd half, but they dug quite the hole in the 1st half helped by the PI right after the turnover, and allowing Washington to convert the 3rd and Mile on the drive right before halftime. Both lapses led to touchdowns. The question about kicking is a good one. The 1st XP (33 yards) and 31 yd FG notwithstanding, the only thing I can think of is that the Giants don't have much faith in their 3rd kicker of the season. I would have also thought they would have called for an onside kick with 2:48 to go. It didn't make sense to me to go for 2 at 24-16, but because they did, why not run it? The Giants were gashing Washington's run defense all afternoon. In both instances, they called for passes on both attempts. At least the Giants didn't give up a TD on the ensuing possession, which would have ended the game for all intents and purposes. OTOH, the field goal didn't really make it it any easier. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Pro Sports (MLB, NFL, NBA, etc)
The Official 2024 NY Giants Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom