Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 3908256, member: 44"] Here we can find some agreement. Charlie Sheen was a great idea and timely and it was adopted by the board. Tom Brady was a sucky idea in those some of us tried to prop it up as best we could but bad is bad. Your job as judge is to pick some thing that interesting and engaging. Your argument is essentially “ I picked a study of 18th century French poetry as our mojo rallying cry this year. It’s not my fault if people didn’t run with it.“ It’s fine Deep. I’m sure you did your very best. I’d like to say it was a plucky and gritty effort, but sadly it wasn’t even that. [/QUOTE]