Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="auror, post: 4617715, member: 1329"] Point values on these things are always tricky, but we can take a cue from March madness pools, to kind of figure out how we value the different rounds. The standard is the doubling every round point value, but most people who are serious about this kind of thing agree that that puts way too much emphasis on the champion, even though we do emphasize the champion a lot in real life. You've gone with the just elevate by one every round, which doesn't seem to give enough value to going far. What many people believe is it better system is the Fibonacci sequence. Try running it again with this modified Fibonacci 2-3-5-8-13-21. [/QUOTE]