Ah, Mr. Bronsteen again. Every 2 years he gets bored reading law journals so he does some research on UConn women's basketball (logs on to message boards and espn) and writes an article. Tomorrow he'll be back to teaching contracts to some bored 1st years.
UConnCat, I'm a huge fan of yours, so please forgive me for expressing the tentative view that you might be a bit too hard on these Slate articles. Over the past 30 years, one of the biggest developments in sports journalism is that some of its top practitioners had no access to inside information and instead made their careers by just watching the games, reading message boards and ESPN, and writing what they thought. The early writings of Bill Simmons (who was not a professor but held the equally random job of bartender), to take one of countless examples, revolutionized the field that way. Some great journalists have access to players and coaches and get quotes from them, but that doesn’t automatically make the journalist an astute observer, and it isn’t the only way to write good stuff.
Moreover, I think these Slate articles have a better track record than you've given them credit for. The first one came out just as Stewie was winning her fourth championship and was titled “The UConn Women’s Basketball Dynasty Is Over” -- which proved to be true. The second one came out two years ago. It predicted that UConn would land Bueckers, Fudd, and Amari DeBerry, none of whom had yet committed -- which proved to be true. That second article also predicted that in 2019, UConn “won’t win the title this year and will fail to reach its lofty standards next year while still being a dangerous tournament team that no one wants to face.” Also true. And it ended by predicting this: “Give it two or three years, and most fans will have forgotten that Geno Auriemma’s Huskies ever fell from their perch at all.” That, too, seems like a really good guess at the moment.
These articles are far from perfect, but given how hard it is to predict anything in sports, and how virtually everyone gets so much wrong, let’s give this its due. If you don’t like the substance, that’s one thing. But I very respectfully submit that criticizing it because of the author's job isn't the most relevant objection.