Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="visitingcock, post: 4290354, member: 6872"]
I agree with this article 99% (nobody gets a 100 in my class)

But I'm gonna change gears. Stanford and the PAC-12. Marketing, visibility and attendance.

Why is one of the game's most important conferences so poorly supported in liberal, strongly feminist regions of the country?

1. Late games reduces national interest especially Friday nights.

2. The poorly run PAC Network, Larry Scott's legacy of failure.

3. Little fan support which I attribute to poor promotion by the schools/conference (exception: Oregon 2020)

4. Fans of PAC teams often say "too much to do." That argument might fly for Southern Cal, But for Corvallis/Portland.Eugene in the rainy months? Seattle?

PAC needs to step up their game. Okay, not their "game" but their visibility. Fill those gyms even if its with middle schoolers!  Dump the PAC network and make games avalable through more  viewable outlets. Stanford? Promote your talented women and legendary coach.

A more visible PAC is something that would benefit the whole game on a national level.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach