Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Football
the Future of Conference ...
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="freescooter, post: 3308131, member: 1023"] I kind of agree with that. At one point during the earlier round of realignment there was a trial balloon of creating a league with FSU Miami Alabama ND Texas USC Michigan Ohio State Penn State and a few others. Obviously if you did it today you’d want Clemson maybe not USC and/or Miami. But the concept was maybe 16 teams who would play only each other. I think that is still possible that something like that emerges. If you are Alabama why do you want to carry Vanderbilt? You are Texas do you really want to go to Iowa City and, ugh, Kansas every year? Clemson wants to carry the ACC why exactly? [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Football
the Future of Conference ...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom