Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="REB1094, post: 4542835, member: 12147"]
In the games since Providence:
[LIST]
[*]Seton Hall: 73% FT, 18% 3P
[*]@ Creighton: 100% FT (4 attempts), 26% 3P
[*]Marquette: 59% FT, 52% 3P
[*]@ GTown: 40% FT (5 attempts), 50% 3P
[*]@ DePaul: 88% FT, 25% 3P
[*]Xavier: 76% FT, 36% 3P
[*]Butler: 68% FT, 37% 3P
[*]@ Seton Hall: 93% FT, 39% 3P
[*]SJU: 74% FT, 31% 3P
[*]@ Marquette: 80% FT, 27% 3P
[*]Creighton: 83% FT, 33% 3P
[/LIST]
Some outliers here and there but feels like our run rate is around mid 70's for FT, mid 30's for 3P with some major swings in each direction. Live by the 3, die by the 3. Hopefully at home we live by it. I agree with Hurley that we weren't necessarily getting bad looks last time, just couldn't make them. Unfortunately this has been the case for many games this year so it feels more like an uncontrollable coin flip rather than controllable shot quality

Providence won't shoot 35 FTs again. They do play physically, but the officiating crew last time was VERY generous to them. Definitely won't get those ticky tacks called in CT
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach