The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start | Page 12 | The Boneyard

The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start

Tommyboy

a lot of people go to college for seven years
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,850
Reaction Score
5,452
We're one win away from a transitive property national championship.

UConn > Buffalo > NIU > ND


We would have it for both of them on the other side as well but just a couple extra games. ;)

UConn > Georgia State > Vanderbilt > Alabama > Georgia > Texas

UConn > North Carolina > Minnesota > Illinois > Michigan > Ohio St
 

UConnDan97

predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
12,542
Reaction Score
48,204
We would have it for both of them on the other side as well but just a couple extra games. ;)

UConn > Georgia State > Vanderbilt > Alabama > Georgia > Texas

UConn > North Carolina > Minnesota > Illinois > Michigan > Ohio St
Finally, the proof that UConn are the most deserving team to be called 2025 FBS Champions! I'm good with that...
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,808
Reaction Score
5,789
Pleased to see Franklin lose but an all big10 final would’ve made Paul Finebaums head explode, which also would’ve been entertaining.
He detests Notre dame more than big 10 so he was in a no win situation last night and I’m here for all of it
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,796
Reaction Score
14,323
This Penn St/ND game is great.

These playoffs may have started off with blow outs but they picked up the excitement after that. The Texas game, ND game, and this game have been great watches.
My only question was what took so long to get to this format wow I love it
I saw ND twice this year and everyone claims their schedule was weak
Army and Navy may be G 5 but both were fundamentally very Good teams
Those games were complete blowouts , not the expected result for a average team beating tomato cans
I suspected ND was a sleeper after those games.
I love this playoff format . it will be interesting to see the ratings for the semifinals and finals . Not particularly a fan of any of these teams although I always disliked Texas
So hopefully OSU tomorrow and I’ll hope for a great final .
Congratulations to Penn State for a great effort it was a tough loss.
To ND not a bad result for the second best Indy team..
As far as predictions ND can beat Texas ,but the mismatch on the line vs OSU will be impossible to overcome
If Texas pulls it off tonight I have a sneaky suspicion ND will win it all just a hunch.
If it’s OSU toniight it will take a miiricle gor ND to beat OSU . Like the BB tourney you better come to play every game .
 

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,141
Reaction Score
13,580
I will say this, that last offensive possession by PSU was straight out of my College Football '25 playbook. Run a running play deep in your own territory with the intent of possibly running out the clock. Have it pick up a good chunk. Decide to throw and see where I can push it only to have a crossing route picked off. Then on D can't get a stop to hold to a long FG and eventually lose on a game winning FG. It was seriously like watching how some of my games end because I'm too aggressive. However, it's just a game and I can shut off my XBox and try again if I want! :D
 

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,141
Reaction Score
13,580
A 9pm start for this game? Way too late for me to stay up. Especially for two unlikable teams.
 
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
2,670
Reaction Score
7,667
Tough momentum shift for Texas. They tie it up only to let OSU score on long screen play in waning seconds of first half.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,770
Reaction Score
8,614
Tough momentum shift for Texas. They tie it up only to let OSU score on long screen play in waning seconds of first half.
OSU appears to be dominating but Texas seems to be hanging in
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
21,194
Reaction Score
46,196
I don't care how good tOSU's goal line D is, 2nd and 1 you run it up the gut or off-tackle or throw over it... you don't pitch wide.

Game over on the sack and fumble return. Ewers had to know he didn't have all day to throw.

Too bad, was expecting OT.
 
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
2,670
Reaction Score
7,667
I don't care how good tOSU's goal line D is, 2nd and 1 you run it up the gut or off-tackle or throw over it... you don't pitch wide.

Game over on the sack and fumble return. Ewers had to know he didn't have all day to throw.

Too bad, was expecting OT.
Tough luck for Ewers by getting sacked by his ex-roommate on the scoop and score. Good game until the turnovers at the end.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,770
Reaction Score
8,614
I don't care how good tOSU's goal line D is, 2nd and 1 you run it up the gut or off-tackle or throw over it... you don't pitch wide.

Game over on the sack and fumble return. Ewers had to know he didn't have all day to throw.

Too bad, was expecting OT.
Always amazes me how OCs consistently choose to go horizontal instead of vertical on short yardage. If youre within 5ft (less than average height of a male), you can take literally take a half step and fall forward to gain the line, or… you can run 30 feet sideways .
 

Purple Stein

I like to sim things.
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
2,092
Reaction Score
9,176
I don't care how good tOSU's goal line D is, 2nd and 1 you run it up the gut or off-tackle or throw over it... you don't pitch wide.

Game over on the sack and fumble return. Ewers had to know he didn't have all day to throw.

Too bad, was expecting OT.
I was shaking my head after that stretch run play call. You've got Manning on the bench, too. And why have Ewers in the shotgun at the one yard line?

Felt like the moment got a little too big for Sark there.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,233
Reaction Score
25,287
The haters never understood. In the poll era, Oregon would have been the unanimous #1. In the BCS era the title game would have been Oregon and Georgia. In the four team playoff, the 4 would have been Oregon, Georgia, Texas and either OSU or Notre Dame. Penn State' loss to Oregon in the Big Ten Championship would have knocked them out in favor of OSU. The debate would have been ND's weak schedule, loss to NIU, vs OSU's two loses. My guess the committee would have picked, Oregon vs Texas and Georgia vs Ohio State and you would have heard screaming from all sides for too many or too few SEC/BIG teams. You may have seen SMU bump Texas and it's unlikely Clemson would have won the ACC if there wasn't an autobid. The polls would have reflected this as well.

This is the perfect system. It has two jobs. 1. make a ton of money - check. The second job is not to figure out the fairest way to construction bracket, it's to see that the teams that have a realistic shot at winning are in. This year there were 6 (maybe 8 if you believe in champions getting a shot), mission accomplished. If your team fell short, it's no one's fault but their own. That includes Alabama.

Anyone advocating for a change is just shilling for the P2 to have an easier path to the final four. Change nothing.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,905
Reaction Score
13,347
Probably the best one yet. Lol

FB_IMG_1736631674383.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
11,388
Reaction Score
18,894
Maybe the top 4 teams with byes get an on campus games my only gripe. People are gonna bitch no matter what the format is though.
 

UConnDan97

predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
12,542
Reaction Score
48,204
The quality of the games in the later rounds vs. earlier shows us that 12 was too many.
The top 4 seeded teams were beaten by the teams that dominated the first round, so there's a better argument to be made that we had too few. If #1 couldn't beat #8 and #2 couldn't beat #7, could they also have been beaten by a #13 or a #14?? (Alabama, South Carolina). The answer of course is "yes they could have"...
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
11,388
Reaction Score
18,894
Im gonna run probably a 40 team tournament in a little bit, we'll see how my simulation goes.
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
21,194
Reaction Score
46,196
The top 4 seeded teams were beaten by the teams that dominated the first round, so there's a better argument to be made that we had too few. If #1 couldn't beat #8 and #2 couldn't beat #7, could they also have been beaten by a #13 or a #14?? (Alabama, South Carolina). The answer of course is "yes they could have"...
Alternatively, it could also be argued that teams with the bye were at a disadvantage, therefore eight was the proper number, eliminating byes.
 

Online statistics

Members online
195
Guests online
2,001
Total visitors
2,196

Forum statistics

Threads
160,853
Messages
4,240,765
Members
10,096
Latest member
catsfan11


.
Top Bottom