Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
The Commission on College Basketball will share its recommendations Wednesday, April 25...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="TRUCONN76, post: 2701052, member: 4143"] The biggest flaw in the commissions report is its attempt to exempt the NCAA from responsibility for the corruption that has over taken the sport. It blames the college presidents as it should, but it doesn't emphasize the presidents of certain schools are and have been the problem. The presidents of most schools I suspect are demanding of compliance. How do they not go hard after the organization whose responsibility it is to provide oversight for where its priorities lie. The questions that I do not see asked and therefore not answered in this report are 1) How did the NCAA not recognize that athletic apparel companies sponsorship of tournaments for high school athletes who were clearly pledged to them not a sign of potential benefits going to the athletes especially when they were almost always ending up at their apparel sponsored schools? 2) When most of the top rated players started picking the same few schools why wasn't that sudden change that then continued year after year for those same schools worth investigating by the NCAA? 3) Why is it that most coachs who were losing recruits to schools that were paying for them knew what was going on but didn't file a complaint with the NCAA, was there a fear of retribution. 4) Why when the signs of massive corruption are everywhere did the NCAA spend so much of its limited investigative resources on so many minor suspected infractions? Finally how could the NCAA justify the penalties to Syracuse and Louisville as being a deterrent at all for future cheating by those schools? I would like to have seen a recommendation that the NCAA be required to issue a summary of all violations reported to them for all institutions for a moving 5 year period , its findings of facts and fault, the penalties issued and comparison of penalties to the severity of the finding and the justification for any significant difference of penalties for similar infractions. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
The Commission on College Basketball will share its recommendations Wednesday, April 25...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom