- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 4,320
- Reaction Score
- 11,275
There is little doubt in my mind that this coaching staff came to the conclusion that given the talent they had (or rather, did not have), they would need to be fairly inovative with the offense. Hense, two offensive schemes and a QB rotation. I think they viewed the offense as a complete rebuild and I think they were justified in that conclusion.
First, the offense had issues in the passing game that they inherited.
Second, the personnel losses from the start of last season were staggering:
That all said, we left at least 3 potential Ws on the field this season with Vandy, WM and IS. These guys were just getting going, but they were terrible in those games imo. Don't get me started on clock management......
First, the offense had issues in the passing game that they inherited.
Second, the personnel losses from the start of last season were staggering:
- top 3 QBs (granted, in passing on Box they may have been shortsighted)
- top 4 RBs (don't forget Meme who could have been a huge help this year as a power back)
- top 3 OGs (then throw Bennet in at OT for good measure)
- an NFL FB and probably one of the best in the country
- 2 WRs - one the leading receiver from last season and the other, Difton, a likely 2 deap this season
That all said, we left at least 3 potential Ws on the field this season with Vandy, WM and IS. These guys were just getting going, but they were terrible in those games imo. Don't get me started on clock management......