Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Gamecockfan77, post: 5106705, member: 6414"] I do not mind the concept of saying Tennessee and Stanford are 1st class blue bloods. I do question giving blue blood status to programs that haven't been relevant for 30 years and leaving off other programs that have had longer runs of success than those no longer contending programs. It doesn't really make sense that ten years in 1970/1980 is more important for blue blood status than Geno's 30 year run at UConn. That's very much saying that Army football is currently a blue blood and someone like Miami or FSU is not. Part of the WBB problem in dictating these things is that the sport is really only one coach deep at a lot of places [/QUOTE]