The Athletic Most Influential Games Since 2000 | The Boneyard
.

The Athletic Most Influential Games Since 2000

Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
14,143
Reaction Score
77,089


Pretty good list, but always others you could have.

UConn games:
20. Kemba has a mismatch
13. 6OT Syracuse
4. George Mason

Of teams with multiple games on the list, Duke has 4 games, UConn 3, Kansas 3, North Carolina, 3, Gonzaga 2, Syracuse 2, UCLA 2, Kentucky 2, and Georgetown 2.
 


Pretty good list, but always others you could have.

UConn games:
20. Kemba has a mismatch
13. 6OT Syracuse
4. George Mason

Of teams with multiple games on the list, Duke has 4 games, UConn 3, Kansas 3, North Carolina, 3, Gonzaga 2, Syracuse 2, UCLA 2, Kentucky 2, and Georgetown 2.

How many did PC or BC have?
 
It's the win that got them into the elite 8 this past year, the furthest a low major seed (14+ in my definition) has ever gotten.
I doubt any casual fan remembers that game. But they sure do remember UConn/Pitt.
 


Pretty good list, but always others you could have.

UConn games:
20. Kemba has a mismatch
13. 6OT Syracuse
4. George Mason

Of teams with multiple games on the list, Duke has 4 games, UConn 3, Kansas 3, North Carolina, 3, Gonzaga 2, Syracuse 2, UCLA 2, Kentucky 2, and Georgetown 2.

I thought we weren’t supposed to mention #4
 
Every college basketball fan remembers it, it just happened 7 months ago and was the highest rated sweet 16 game since 2011. You don't remember it.
I’d take UConn over Pitt all day long and I live for college bball.

Purdue is Purdue lol, they’ve gained more recognition bc the media has a hard on for BigTen since Fauci
 
What you may have forgotten was that 15 seed St Peter’s had already dispatched 2 seed Kentucky. So Purdue was second p5 giant slayed by a school from Jersey City that plays its games in something only marginally better than a high school gym. Is was a great story that had even non basketball fans paying attention.
I didn’t forget that. There simply are better games is all, and Purdue is historically not that good. Them beating a Northwestern, Nebraska, Minnesota, Rutgers, etc is the equivalent of Purdue
 
I didn’t forget that. There simply are better games is all, and Purdue is historically not that good. Them beating a Northwestern, Nebraska, Minnesota, Rutgers, etc is the equivalent of Purdue
Northwestern has won 1 tournament game, Purdue has won around 50. Purdue has won 24 Big 10 championships, the most ever. Northwestern won 2 around 100 years ago.
 
Northwestern has won 1 tournament game, Purdue has won around 50. Purdue has won 24 Big 10 championships, the most ever. Northwestern won 2 around 100 years ago.
Throwing in Northwestern was a mistake, but that’s how I view them and the majority of the BigTen, overrated. And good for them on the conference titles, most of those were pre WW2 lol

They have how many Final Fours? 2. To me, they’re never really a serious contender
 

Online statistics

Members online
310
Guests online
3,202
Total visitors
3,512

Forum statistics

Threads
164,521
Messages
4,399,833
Members
10,214
Latest member
illini2013


.
..
Top Bottom