Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KnightBridgeAZ, post: 5351820, member: 591"] Maybe it seems to lean heavily on pro, but if you read the text voters were told to consider only college. The problem was stated by Lobo - that there were more great players than slots. That's what makes it difficult. The text of the article also indicates that criteria - other than college career only - such as number of championships, impact, etc. were entirely up to the individual voters. Ultimately, I have to say that I don't see most of your list making it - not because they were not excellent players - but I'm not sure they are comparable to the players chosen. Most didn't win national championships, which I'm sure was a criteria for some voters. Neither Stiles or Paris strike me as top 16 players (I'll admit of the ones chosen that I wasn't sure about Griner either). [/QUOTE]